Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Censoring, paranoia and "sippenhaft"

Author: Harry Field

Date: 08:19:48 12/08/00

Go up one level in this thread


On December 08, 2000 at 11:01:18, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>On December 08, 2000 at 05:35:12, Harry Field wrote:
>
>>On December 08, 2000 at 04:50:41, Thorsten Czub wrote:
>>
>>>On December 07, 2000 at 15:18:05, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>>>>I know..  we have experienced a "paradigm shift".  It was originally simply
>>>>"drive into the fog".  Now it is "first make a lot of fog, then drive into it."
>>>>
>>>>:)
>>>
>>>:-)))) in other forum (computer-schach and spiele forum) people
>>>get censored and deleted not because they insult or
>>>be impolite, but because their names come close to my name :-))))
>>>
>>>Torsten Schoop e.g. or
>>>Thomas Lagershausen.
>>>
>>>they have in common that Torsten = Thorsten and Czub sounds like Schoop.
>>>with Thomas Lagershausen its more funny, he only has 3 letters in common:
>>>THO !!
>>>thats enough for bertil eklund and other who behave paranoic to call him
>>>whatever and offend this poor guy.
>>>
>>>i think the next step is to put anybody in prison who has glasses,
>>>because i wear glasses too :-))
>>>
>>>Brave new world !
>>
>>Funny!
>>
>>All bulletin boards tend to take taken over by cliques, where the individuals
>>post a lot and tend to agree with each other, often by being 'opposed' to
>>another clique or person(s). When the same individuals have censorship power
>>they use it. Their ability to remove criticism strengthens their world view for
>>themselves, and, since all world views are subject to internal contradictions,
>>they effectively mask these contradictions, developing a
>>One-Flew-Over-The-Cuckoos-Nest lobotomised view of the world, in which they
>>carry out real stupidities in the name of their rationalised reasonableness.
>>Hence the deletion of "THO" posts!!!
>>
>>Take it as a compliment when you can get a clique to be that stupid!
>
>If you spent 1/2 the time working on your program compared to the time you
>spend stirring things up here, it would be a dangerous program...

Your references to "chaos", "stirring things up", imply to me that you are
frightened of words and frightened of change. Since my language is non-abusive,
contains no rude words, and generally makes sense, I can only further assume
that you don't like accurate criticism. They are only words, you know.

Would acquiring a sense of proportion he helpful to you?






This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.