Author: Bruce Moreland
Date: 09:03:49 12/08/00
Go up one level in this thread
On December 08, 2000 at 11:53:20, Harry Field wrote: >On December 08, 2000 at 08:42:07, Thorsten Czub wrote: > >>On December 08, 2000 at 06:58:33, Michael Cummings wrote: >> >>>I have seen r.g.c.c and if you prefer that rather than this place, then I >>>suggest you use that forum :) >> >>i guess i know his point. >> >>he believes: ccc was found to get rid of the fools. certain fools >>who called a group of 20 international people with very bad names. >> >>now these fools have changed location. and suddenly all of them are >>in THIS forum using faked names and creating chaos. >> >>he wants to say: rgcc is less full of fools than ccc. > >And you want to say that when you post here, or GambitSoft (you are permanently >excluded from the ChessBase Forum), then you can get massively personally >attacked, mostly by "anons". You receive, AFAIK, no protection from this at all. > >You are worried to say, because you could be too easily accused of paranoia, >that you think there is a "plot" to eliminate you from computer chess by >stalking you and trying to destroy your reputation. Oh please. Why don't you just throw a little gasoline on things? >If one feels such a plot exists on another person, it is not so easy to be >accused of paranoia by stating so. I think you are the victim of some >elimination conspiracy by some interested person(s). This is not new in this >"community", it happens to others also. If there is effective moderation it >should precisely be protecting you from these noname attacks and from persistent >stalking attacks. But it doesn't. Instead it seems to be worried about some >strange "chaos" that it keeps referring to. That would be you. bruce
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.