Author: Bertil Eklund
Date: 13:24:47 12/08/00
Go up one level in this thread
On December 08, 2000 at 13:01:33, Djordje Vidanovic wrote: >On December 07, 2000 at 22:09:40, K. Burcham wrote: > >>in july, 1988, at the world open in philadelphia, pennsylvannia, this fidelity >>program made chess history and became the first microcomputer to earn a master >>rating of 2265. fidelity started selling the same program, model 6113. it is >>called a designer mach lll master. fidelity started selling this same program in >>a table top sensory board. anyway, i bought one of these back then. i have taken >>real good care of it. it is like new. fidelity sent out a certificate, >>certifying that each one had the 2265 rating. i also kept this certificate in >>perfect shape. i have had it in storage for several years. i thought it would be >>fun to see how it would play against todays programs with new hardware. in case >>you are interested, it uses a 68000 microprocessor running at 16 mhz, with 64k >>rom, and 80k ram. i played it against my 1050 mhz 384 megs ram. shredder4 hash >>set at 96megs , shredder4 evaluation tables set at 16 megs. shredder4 used >>default settings. game time for both set at 30 minutes. fidelity set at >>strongest settings. opening---ruy lopez/marshall counterattack. of couse s4 won. >>but it took 58 moves. didnt think it would last that many moves. do i understand >>this right, the fidelity has no hash tables, so does this mean it does not think >>on the opponents time. so is the ram cleared after every move. it was averaging >>about 6 ply on this 30 minute time control. it held shredder4 off for about 20 >>minutes of a 30 minute game. so maybe that wasnt too bad for such an weak old >>timer. >> thanks > > >I used to have a Mach III machine which would go as high as 7,000-8,000 nps and >played a pretty strong game (I'd say about 2000 ELO, and higher at blitz >levels). It used up to 144kb hash I think and played one of the strongest >endgames of the time. It came in a plastic casing that was a little awkward to >use and the first time I pitted it against a PC program (Rex Chess) it managed >to draw the little match. > >*** Djordje Hi! I still play fom time to time with my Avant-Garde version (full-size in wood) and still loose more than I win in blitz. The interesting thing is that it had a learner so you couldn't repeat a win. Bertil
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.