Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: About Mogen Larsen's board postion...

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 15:27:08 12/08/00

Go up one level in this thread


On December 08, 2000 at 17:32:24, Uri Blass wrote:

>On December 08, 2000 at 17:07:10, Uri Blass wrote:
>
>>On December 08, 2000 at 16:52:46, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>>
>>>On December 08, 2000 at 15:25:06, Torstein Hall wrote:
>>>
>>>>On December 08, 2000 at 14:47:37, Dann Corbit wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>[D]2r3k1/5p2/1p2pp1p/pPq5/Pn6/1B6/1P2QPPP/3R2K1 w - - 0 25
>>>>>
>>>>>It seems some programs get the right answer immediately (e.g. Phalanx) and
>>>>>others simply never find it.
>>>>>
>>>>>My question is, "Why?"
>>>>>
>>>>>I tried programs that don't do NULL move, and that did not seem to help.  So
>>>>>what is preventing programs from finding the right choice?
>>>>
>>>>...and Bxe6 is the right move I guess!?
>>>>
>>>>Found by Gambit Tiger in a split second
>>>>
>>>>Torstein
>>>
>>>
>>>You can find this one of two ways.  You give up a piece for potentially three
>>>pawns + no king safety for black.  If this were all there is, it would be a
>>>mistake as white is a piece down.  But there is more.  Going deep enough, black
>>>has to give the piece back, and white simply ends up winning a pawn, period.
>>>
>>>It is not hard to make any program like this.  Crafty hates the idea of giving
>>>a piece for three pawns because 90% of the time that loses.
>>
>>I agree that a piece is better than 3 pawns in most of the cases but
>>I think that it is an exagaration to say that in 90% of the cases the knight is
>>winning.
>>There are many cases when knight for 3 pawns is a draw.
>>
>>  It has to see the
>>>"meat" before it will "bite".  Which takes 14 plies and 3-4 minutes on my xeon.
>>>If a program has big scores for king safety, it will probably bite on this
>>>instantly.  If not, it will have search deep enough to see that black has to
>>>sac the knight to avoid getting mated, leaving white a pawn up in what might
>>>still be a drawn ending (both sides have pawns, plus rook and queen each.
>>
>>The main question is if white can win after Bxe6 fxe6 Qxe6+ Kh8
>>
>>White can take 4 pawns for the piece but I do not see a forced win for white and
>>I suspect that it is a draw.
>>
>>Black does not have to sac the knight in this line but only to sac a pawn.
>>
>>Uri
>
>It seems that white can win more than 4 pawns for the knight after Kh8 and I see
>computer lines when b6 is also captured.
>
>My opinion is now that white has good chances to win.
>Black has an alternative is to try Re8 instead of fxe6 when black is a pawn down
>but again white has good chances to win.
>
>Uri


My analysis never considered Kh8 as reasonable.  Which leads to the line where
black has to offer the knight back.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.