Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 06:06:21 01/20/98
Go up one level in this thread
On January 20, 1998 at 02:21:09, Bernhard Bauer wrote: >On January 19, 1998 at 12:57:52, Bruce Moreland wrote: > >> >>On January 19, 1998 at 10:03:27, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>On January 19, 1998 at 07:10:46, Bernhard Bauer wrote: >> >>>> hash depth time score trans/ref pawn used w used b nps >>>> 64k 31-> 34.82 2.85 79% 99% 98% b96% 109889 >>>> 96k 31-> 23.34 3.04 53% 99% 99% b98% 125695 >>>> 192k 31-> 25.12 3.04 66% 99% 99% b98% 122916 >>>> 384k 31-> 17.73 3.02 74% 99% 99% b98% 126340 >>>> 768k 31-> 9.85 3.25 90% 99% 99% b98% 125667 >>>> 1.5M 31-> 6.50 3.25 121% 99% 79% b92% 126525 >>>> 3M 31-> 3.17 3.25 136% 99% 27% b37% 123640 >>>> 6M 31-> 34.66 2.85 79% 99% 98% b96% 110491 >>>> 12M 31-> 34.25 2.85 82% 99% 88% b83% 109862 >>>> 24M 31-> 36.02 2.85 84% 99% 68% b62% 110227 >> >>1) How much memory is on the machine? >> > >This is a PPro/200 with 64 Mb memory running WinNT4.0. > >>2) Notice how the 6M line is almost identical with the 64K line. Isn't >>that suspicious? > >I tend to think so too, however, I have not enough nowledge about >crafty. >Therefor I would like to see other programs behavior on this problem. >May be you could show us how Ferret does? > >Kind regards >Bernhard > >> >>bruce something is definitely wrong. the hash usage should continue to drop as you make the hash table larger and larger. However the last 3 show that it is higher than the ones before it. I will try to run this myself in a bit and post my results on a 128mb machine...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.