Author: Chessfun
Date: 03:19:05 12/09/00
Go up one level in this thread
On December 08, 2000 at 17:23:05, Amicitia Stone wrote: >On December 08, 2000 at 17:16:11, José Carlos wrote: > >>On December 08, 2000 at 16:55:08, Amicitia Stone wrote: >> >>>On December 08, 2000 at 16:33:34, José Carlos wrote: >>> >>>>On December 08, 2000 at 14:38:54, Amicitia Stone wrote: >>>> >>>>>On December 08, 2000 at 14:02:13, Stefan Meyer-Kahlen wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>I am getting a headache reading all this here in bold. >>>>>> >>>>>>Stefan >>>>> >>>>>I think that no matter what colors are used their will be a percentage of people >>>>>that dislike it. I say we just go back to normal, (all black no bold.) >>>> >>>> I disagree. I'd rather set a poll about this. Personally, I prefer colours. >>>> >>>> José C. >>> >>>Hey José, >>> >>>I also have no problem with colors, however; it's the issue of what colors to >>>use that makes everything so complicated. Some like dark, some liked the green >>>that was used at the begining, some like it bold, some want it in italics, >>>etc... >>>If we have a poll on the use of colors, we would have to have polls on what >>>colors to use, and the format in which to use them. So you can see it would get >>>messy. The way I see it, why change somthing when there is nothing wrong? This >>>place has been up for a while now, and I haven't seen any complaints about >>>colors until recently... >> >> Ok, we can include in the poll the possibility to go back to black and white. >>As well, we can set a minimum percentage of votes to perform the change. Let's >>say, we need a 51% of votes to choose a posibility. If none of the options get >>51%, we stay as before. I don't see a problem as long as we agree in the rules >>of the poll. Progress can be good or bad. Let's ask people what they think. >> >> José C. > >That sounds like a possible way of doing things José. Hopefully we can get some >sort of agreement soon amongst everyone. We'll see I guess. A poll IMO is a bad idea for settling these issues. It may represent the majority at any given point in time but that changes, and we can't be voting on the same issue over and over. Especially if the losers of the vote are vocal then we could easily have this issue again. Treating CCC like a democracy makes no sense IMO. Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.