Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 12:30:16 01/20/98
Go up one level in this thread
On January 20, 1998 at 12:05:23, James Long wrote: >Tristram did not. I searched three times... >(On a 133MHz Cyrix 166+) >The first to a depth of eight ply in 13 sec. It liked >Bxe7 with a score a little over +1.2. > >The second time I set it to search for 180 seconds... >Still Bxe7 with a depth of 11. > >Third time it came up with a couple alternatives, >one was Kb1 at depth 3, and Qc1 at depths 4 and 5, >but it promptly changed back to Bxe7, although >the score dropped to .768 at ply 6 and stayed there >through ply 8, where I terminated the search. > >Not surprising, since I don't have half the >knowledge I would like to yet. Maybe this is a >good test position for gauging positional knowledge? >Is there a consensus for "correct" ? > >-- >James anything else is probably better. The best this leads to is roughly -.5... I'd personally either retreat the bishop from g5 or think about h4.. and on h6 I'd retreat then of course, still avoiding Bxe7 because now Qd8 will have to be played...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.