Author: Paul Doire
Date: 16:42:15 12/10/00
Go up one level in this thread
On December 10, 2000 at 18:27:43, Jason Williamson wrote: >On December 10, 2000 at 18:00:20, Paul Doire wrote: > >>The utility I used for this was Binary Work CPU Controller 1.0 >>it is available at www.tweakbase.com,as I mentioned in my previous post. >>My hardware is Celeron 541(overclocked 433), 128MB RAM, Win98SE. >>*This test was to see if CM6000 and CM8000 CPU control could be limited >> to allow fair, same PC matches.I tested it against Gambit Tiger 1.0 in this >> instance* >> >>Settings Gambit Tiger1.0-NoBook-Brain ON-1 MB Hash >> Set At 12 ply Fixed Depth >> CM8000-NoOBK-PonderOn-Default 1MB Hash >> Infinite Time >> CM6000-NoOBK-PonderOn-Default 1MB Hash >> Infinite Time >>Objective-Note time Gambit Tiger takes to solve 12 ply running alone, >> then with CM8000 in background,then CM6000 in background. >> >>All tests were run from inside utility! >> >>Gambit set to "normal" alone time= 44.5 seconds >>CM8000 set to normal in background= 52.8 seconds >>CM6000 set to normal in background= 50.5 seconds >> >>Gambit set to "normal" alone time= 44.5 seconds >>CM8000 set to "minimum"in background= 46.5 seconds >>CM6000 set to minimum in background= 45.5 seconds >> >>Gambit set to "high" alone time= 44.5 seconds >>CM8000 set to minimum in background= 45 seconds >>CM6000 set to minimum in background= 44.5 seconds >> >>Conclusion: Using this utility it is possible to stop CM's >>influence on Gambit's thinking. >>I will play some matches to verify results. >> >>Regards,Paul > >Chessmaster 8000 doesn't use CPU outside of its thinking. That problem is with >CM6000 and CM7000. Based on these results IMHO it does ,and it clearly shows in this test suite. Cordially Yours, Paul
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.