Author: Tim Mann
Date: 17:52:27 12/10/00
Go up one level in this thread
On December 10, 2000 at 00:08:24, Chessfun wrote: >>>But it would seem to me from that alone Stefan has a reasonable point. >>> >>>Sarah. >> >>What point would that be? > >That a week after UCI these changes are announced. It's a fact that my post was about a week after his, but that's just a raw fact, not a point. It would have been wiser for me to put a paragraph at the top of my post saying that this was something I've been working on for a few months, and that it's a coincidence that Stefan was working on UCI at the same time. I didn't think to do that, but that doesn't give anyone justification to conclude that I put my work together in a week as a copy of UCI -- especially since my changes to the WinBoard protocol don't work anything like UCI. >I had read a post I believe from you before that you would no longer be working >on any changes to Winboard. If I'm wrong then I apologize in advance. I've said at various times that I was doing little or nothing on WinBoard anymore. In fact I did very little on it for about a year and a half; the changes between 4.0.0 and 4.0.7 were all pretty small, and much of the new stuff in 4.1.0 was donated by another programmer. I certainly didn't promise never to work on WinBoard again, though. I don't see that anyone has the right to complain if I decide to work on it some more and fix some problems with it.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.