Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 02:18:15 12/11/00
Go up one level in this thread
On December 11, 2000 at 04:41:37, Uri Blass wrote: >The latest version is Deep Fritz and the question is if Deep fritz has similiar >evaluation. as far as it looks it is a decision. they SET the score by will that low. if search sees nothing. easy to find out. replay the games enrique has played out between gambit-tiger and DF and look in the scores... if the scores have draw-score areas, check with another NORMAL program and if this normal program produces sensible data, DF is also on the trip. i will do it myself in a few hours after breakfast. >I disagree. :-)) >I think that all the programmers of top programs worked a lot of time about >their program. yes yes. it was no insult. i quoted somebody. >I guess that the programmers of all the top programs worked more than 1000 hours >on their program. >The lazy guys did not develop a chess program or developed only a very weak >program. was einstein lazy ? >I disagree. >There are positions when it does not evaluate king attacks correctly but >Fritz sacrificed a piece for a king attack in the game against Crafty in the >last WMCCC. >Fritz3 got a title and Fritz also got a second place in the last WMCCC. >Second place is almost a title. almost. but in PR only a title works. also when frans gets a title he can make a better deal with CB. title is good. >I do not see that Fritz is clearly weaker than the opponents. ok. >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.