Author: Mogens Larsen
Date: 05:13:22 12/11/00
Go up one level in this thread
On December 11, 2000 at 07:08:56, Thorsten Czub wrote: >so the draw-score in this score stopped df from seeing >the point. >therefore it lost the game. No, you can't make a conclusion like that. What would an evalution of -2 have helped. Would it have used more time? No, not according to the game. Approx. the same amount of time used when behind. Would it choose other moves? No, it still selects the move it believes to be best. Change plans? No, programs doesn't make plans. The only real chance of changing direction IMO would have been a fail low, forcing it (presumedly) to search for an alternative. Transposing a consistant score up and down wouldn't change much, if anything at all AFAIK. >more examples needed ? analyse enriques games... If the purpose is to establish the obvious fact that programs misevaluates certain positions then it's a profound waste of time unless you're writing one. Mogens.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.