Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 05:17:10 12/11/00
Go up one level in this thread
On December 11, 2000 at 07:31:11, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >Cherry picking... Analyze also the games that Fritz won and Gambit lost, and >already posted wrong attacking evals of Gambit when overestimating a king >attack. Now and then even the strongest programs evaluate positions wrongly, >meaning that chess has not been solved, which might come as a shocking surprise >to you. :) you are completely on the wrong track. gambit tiger (as cstal) was designed to build strong king attacks. its a feature. of course gambit-tiger will overestimate many king attacks. this is because it is as inaccurate enough. but even beeing as inaccurate as it is: it is still good enough for getting 50% against fritz. i was talking about a thing, that is in fritz for versions. if you call this cherry picking or "Now and then even the strongest programs evaluate positions wrongly, meaning that chess has not been solved, which might come as a shocking surprise to you. :)" is only desinformation of the people. what you say is on a low level. it is so general that it isn't an acceptable answer. i said: one reason why fritz loses is, that it is blind. when it is blind, it has these draw scores. we now see this behaviour is in any version of fritz. and your only answer to this ( i gave concrete examples ! even examples of your OWN data, i am sure you had these data but never understood the data you made yourself ! seems you have the same "bug" fritz has ! 0.00 Enrique ? well : 4.2 for moritz, and 0.00 for enrique !) is: chess is not solved thorsten ! stay on this level. it makes you look very good enrique. >Enrique
This page took 0.02 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.