Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 10:39:52 12/11/00
Go up one level in this thread
On December 11, 2000 at 12:22:17, Djordje Vidanovic wrote: >Hi Thorsten, > >So we're back to square one again. First it was the elections when, regardless >of what you heard (and learned) about the electoral system in the USA, nothing >could sway you. Now you go back to your old flame, ChessBase / Fritz, again with >a single-minded approach, disregarding Christophe's explanation about different >types of evaluation... disregarding Enrique's results... ready to disregard >future SSDF results too... djordje. i find you post off-topic and very impolite. i posted examples where fritz shows a "behaviour" i know for years. i showed where in enriques data the same happens for DF. now you come with "Now you go back to your old flame, ChessBase / Fritz, " allegations. christophe can have a different opinion than me. thats HIS point of view. enriques "results" show nothing else than that DF HAS this behaviour too, and the fact that in short time controls they get 50%. i don't see how this has anything to do with the pattern i wanted to talk about. my post was about computerchess. i showed where it is and when. and instead of saying something to the thing, you come with personal attacks and statements. if you don't stop this behaviour, i will complain to the moderator. i am not in this forum to talk with you about your prejudices concerning my behaviour. i posted computerchess topic and want to talk about this. thank you. >Rien n’est plus dangereux qu’une idée, quand on n’a qu’une idée. ganz toll ! französisch hatte ich auch in der schule ! >Salut, > >Djordje
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.