Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: CM8000 - the signs of scores are confused

Author: John Merlino

Date: 13:06:07 12/11/00

Go up one level in this thread


On December 11, 2000 at 14:52:28, William Penn wrote:

>The signs of scores are confused in CM8000.  Previously it was confirmed there
>is a problem with omitting the minus sign when the score number is in the range
>of -0.01 to -0.99.  Now, here is an example of the signs being wrong when the
>score number is larger than 1.00.
>
>BR  --  --  BQ  BK  --  BN  BR
>--  BP  BP  BB  --  --  --  --
>--  BB  --  --  BP  BP  --  BP
>BP  WP  --  BP  WP  --  BP  --
>WP  --  --  WP  --  --  --  WN
>--  WN  WP  WB  --  --  --  WP
>--  --  --  --  --  WP  WP  --
>WR  --  WB  WQ  WR  --  WK  --
>
>White: a custom personality   Black: human   Black to move
>
>if Chessmaster box checked in Thinking Lines window
>Time  Depth Score Positions Moves
>0:07  7     5.25  210887    h5 Ng6 Rh7 exf6 Qxf6 Ne5 Rh6 Qc2
>0:27  8     5.01  716123    h5 Ng6 Rh7 exf6 Qxf6 Ne5 Rh6 Qd2
>1:11  9     5.46  2169809   h5 Ng6 Rh6 Bxg5 fxg5 Qf3 Bxb5 Bxb5+ ...
>3:46  10    5.71  7208736   h5 Ng6 Rh7 exf6 Qxf6 Ne5 Rh6 h4 ...
>21:56 11    6.15  42116395  h5 Ng6 Rh7 exf6 Qxf6 Ne5 Rh6 Nf3 ...
>
>if White box checked in Thinking Lines window
>Time  Depth Score Positions Moves
>0:04  7     -5.25  210887    h5 Ng6 Rh7 exf6 Qxf6 Ne5 Rh6 Qc2
>0:13  8     -5.01  716123    h5 Ng6 Rh7 exf6 Qxf6 Ne5 Rh6 Qd2
>0:35  9     -5.46  2169809   h5 Ng6 Rh6 Bxg5 fxg5 Qf3 Bxb5 Bxb5+ ...
>1:52  10    -5.71  7208736   h5 Ng6 Rh7 exf6 Qxf6 Ne5 Rh6 h4 ...
>10:49 11    -6.15  42116395  h5 Ng6 Rh7 exf6 Qxf6 Ne5 Rh6 Nf3 ...
>
>Everything is the same in these two charts except the signs of the scores and
>the times. That's because the custom personality is identical to Chessmaster,
>just with a different name.  The first chart takes twice as much time because
>another engine was running in the background, unknown to me (inadvertently, i.e.
>that's another major problem with CM8000!?).
>
>Although it would be possible to define a special protocol to make these results
>acceptable, that would complicate things unnecessarily, and will cause mass
>confusion because it departs from what almost everyone expects.  Again, the
>standard protocol is that the score is positive when white has an advantage, and
>is negative when black has an advantage -- independent of who has the move.  It
>should also be independent of which box(es) is checked in the Thinking Lines
>window!
>
>Obviously white is winning in this position, so the signs of the scores should
>be positive in all cases.
>WP

I cannot duplicate this. How are you setting up a position with Black to move,
and then clicking on the White checkbox and getting output? The White engine
should not start thinking (in this instance) until it is its turn to move? Could
you give the full move list that arrived at this position?

Also, it should be noted that the bug involving negative scores less than -1.00
has been found and fixed. Thanks again for your assitance,

jm



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.