Author: stuart taylor
Date: 16:23:59 12/11/00
Go up one level in this thread
On December 11, 2000 at 13:25:02, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On December 11, 2000 at 12:14:58, stuart taylor wrote: > >>Gambit-Tiger isn't a main program, just as Gambit Shredder isn't. >>But with Shredder you DID use its main program. >>Chess Tiger MUST get more than Fritz 6a, in my opinion. > >You can't compare the Gambit Tiger, Chess Tiger pair with the Shredder, Gambit >Shredder pair. Gambit Shredder is identical to Shredder apart from changing a >limited set of parameters. Gambit Tiger contains knowledge different from Chess >Tiger even though the core is similar AFAIK. I imagine that GT and CT will both >be tested as individual programs by SSDF, Gambit Shredder won't. > >The tournament conducted was legitimate but limited as strength comparison due >to the number of games played. > >Mogens. OK, so you can't compare. My point was that You cannot say that Fritz6a is still the best without testing vs. Chess Tiger. S.Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.