Author: Mike S.
Date: 16:35:19 12/11/00
Go up one level in this thread
Based on some tests with programs of the previous generation(s), including Hiarcs 7.32, I assume that Chess System Tal II, Comet and Socrates 3 are positionally best (many others performed better than H7.32 in my set of positional tests, too). But these impressions can vary much, depending on which test suite is used, or if the programs are watched closely in games (which I haven't done often). The reputation of Hiarcs as being positionally good, originates from LCT II test results with the 3.0 version IMO. I have the impression that the engine became more balanced during the version history - which means tactically and in the endgame better, but positionally (probably) somewhat decreased. Regards, M.Scheidl
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.