Author: Chessfun
Date: 16:39:02 12/11/00
Go up one level in this thread
On December 11, 2000 at 19:23:59, stuart taylor wrote: >On December 11, 2000 at 13:25:02, Mogens Larsen wrote: > >>On December 11, 2000 at 12:14:58, stuart taylor wrote: >> >>>Gambit-Tiger isn't a main program, just as Gambit Shredder isn't. >>>But with Shredder you DID use its main program. >>>Chess Tiger MUST get more than Fritz 6a, in my opinion. >> >>You can't compare the Gambit Tiger, Chess Tiger pair with the Shredder, Gambit >>Shredder pair. Gambit Shredder is identical to Shredder apart from changing a >>limited set of parameters. Gambit Tiger contains knowledge different from Chess >>Tiger even though the core is similar AFAIK. I imagine that GT and CT will both >>be tested as individual programs by SSDF, Gambit Shredder won't. >> >>The tournament conducted was legitimate but limited as strength comparison due >>to the number of games played. >> >>Mogens. > >OK, so you can't compare. My point was that You cannot say that Fritz6a is still >the best without testing vs. Chess Tiger. >S.Taylor Yes I think he can as he wrote "FRitz6a still the best!?" It still has to be proved IMO that Fritz 6 isn't the best, which is what the SSDF will soon find out. Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.