Author: stuart taylor
Date: 02:49:16 12/12/00
Go up one level in this thread
On December 11, 2000 at 19:39:02, Chessfun wrote: >On December 11, 2000 at 19:23:59, stuart taylor wrote: > >>On December 11, 2000 at 13:25:02, Mogens Larsen wrote: >> >>>On December 11, 2000 at 12:14:58, stuart taylor wrote: >>> >>>>Gambit-Tiger isn't a main program, just as Gambit Shredder isn't. >>>>But with Shredder you DID use its main program. >>>>Chess Tiger MUST get more than Fritz 6a, in my opinion. >>> >>>You can't compare the Gambit Tiger, Chess Tiger pair with the Shredder, Gambit >>>Shredder pair. Gambit Shredder is identical to Shredder apart from changing a >>>limited set of parameters. Gambit Tiger contains knowledge different from Chess >>>Tiger even though the core is similar AFAIK. I imagine that GT and CT will both >>>be tested as individual programs by SSDF, Gambit Shredder won't. >>> >>>The tournament conducted was legitimate but limited as strength comparison due >>>to the number of games played. >>> >>>Mogens. >> >>OK, so you can't compare. My point was that You cannot say that Fritz6a is still >>the best without testing vs. Chess Tiger. >>S.Taylor > > >Yes I think he can as he wrote "FRitz6a still the best!?" > >It still has to be proved IMO that Fritz 6 isn't the best, which is what >the SSDF will soon find out. > >Sarah. Sarah, It's interesting that you can be so hot about a subject which is all about keeping cool! S.Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.