Author: Mogens Larsen
Date: 03:01:03 12/12/00
Go up one level in this thread
On December 12, 2000 at 05:29:48, stuart taylor wrote: >SO maybe we really DO need alot of games to know how strong a program is exactly >(unless, possibly if you test in a special way). Yes, we need a lot of games. > At first I thought Shredder was ripping up both Tigers, until later games >changed that course for CT. And here is 4 draws with a smaller program. I would be surprised if there are any significant strength differences between GT, CT, Rebel Century, Deep Fritz and Shredder. And Gandalf is somewhere in the vicinity. It's mostly a question style and/or features IMHO. > So perhaps we can conclude that moves which are good in one way, are bad in >another way!!!? Or maybe that a nudge is as good as a wink to a blind bat. Mogens.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.