Author: Mike S.
Date: 15:15:14 12/12/00
Go up one level in this thread
On December 12, 2000 at 16:19:27, Robert Hyatt wrote: >(...) > >The real problem is that GMs that are not in the top 100 give programs fits on >ICC all the time. I won't mention names, but it is common. Because they tend >to play the opponent, which is perfectly normal. I don't think a GM would care >_which_ computer he has to play, but he would certainly want to know that he >is playing a computer (I think computers are more similar than most would give >them credit for being). I'd be interested, what your opinion is from watching these ICC GM games: What is the most important, or most often successfully used anti-computer strategy? Is it a) avoiding tactics and using superior positional knowledge b) following long-term ideas or plans, which the computer fails to understand c) preparing for a king attack slowly, and the computer defends too late d) looking for a transition into a better endgame, or e) something else (?) Thanks, M.Scheidl
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.