Author: Aloisio Ponti Lopes
Date: 19:06:39 12/12/00
Go up one level in this thread
On December 12, 2000 at 12:25:23, Christopher R. Dorr wrote: >I just vaguely recall seeing it. But the exact number isn't important. There is >no *theoretical* way to get something like that. You are assuming that some kind >of breathtaking advance in computer science will take place before then. It may, >but why on earth would you count on it? I'd put much more money on the >probability of pigs evolving wings than on chess being solved within the next 50 >years. > >Chris You're right! Just tell those crazy guys that cloned Dolly you want pigs with wings, and wait a year or two. That's it. The interesting questions here are:1) Why do we want to get Chess solved? 2) Is it really necessary? 3) Will we learn something useful from these algorythms? A. Ponti P.S.: Maybe those crazy guys will get _really_ interested in that idea of pigs with wings... a new paradigm!
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.