Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Correction: Re: MTD(f) ?

Author: Djordje Vidanovic

Date: 12:02:06 12/13/00

Go up one level in this thread


On December 13, 2000 at 14:58:34, Djordje Vidanovic wrote:

>On December 13, 2000 at 14:15:06, martin fierz wrote:
>
>>hi,
>>
>>after reading the description of mtd(f) it seemed to me that this kind of
>>algorithm could only work if the whole tree still fits in the hashtable, and
>>that once it doesnt fit in any more it would get terribly inefficient. is this
>>right or wrong? are there any chess programs using mtd(f)? i once read that the
>>most popular search is PVS where the first move gets searched normally and all
>>others with a minimal window - is this correct?
>>
>>cheers
>>  martin
>
>
>In MTD (f) positions are tested to see whether they are higher or lower than the
>guessing (done successively for each position).  Memory is hash tables, while
>the Driver tries to assemble the scores for the given position. As the (f)
>designates the first "guess", it should be rather accurate (using the previous
>scores), so one can assume that the tree should get overly large
>(supposedly...).
>
>Apart from AnMon by Christian Barreteau that is an MTD (f) program, there is
>also PostModernist by Andrew Williams that plays on ICC quite successfully.  For
>the time being, PM runs only under Linux and is still a private program.
>
>***  Djordje

>>>tree should get overly large
(supposedly...).

should read as ..."the tree should NOT get overly large..."...  but I guess it
was clear from the previous clause.

***  Djordje



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.