Author: Frank Quisinsky
Date: 14:12:01 12/13/00
Go up one level in this thread
On December 12, 2000 at 14:43:30, Shep wrote: >On December 12, 2000 at 12:53:38, Roy Eassa wrote: > >>I've seen Nimzo 2000, 98, 7.32, and 8. >> >>Obviously 2000 came after 98 and 8 came after 7.32, but what's the relationship >>between the "year" numbers and the "non-year" numbers? >> >>Also, why did the Millennium 2001 package stay with the same version of Nimzo as >>the 2000 package? I thought Nimzo 8 was newer/better. >> >>(Or are there two factions proceeding alone separate, parallel tracks, one with >>98 and 2000, the other with 7.32 and 8?) >> >>Info appreciated. Thanks! > >As far as my overview goes, the versions go like this: > >Nimzo 4 = Nimzo 98 >Nimzo 5 = Nimzo 99 >Nimzo 6 = Nimzo 2000 (Millennium 2000 package, same year as Nimzo 5=99) >Nimzo 7 = Nimzo 7.32 >Nimzo 8 = Nimzo 8.0 > >The Nimzo in the Millennium 2001 package is still the old Nimzo 6=2000. > >--- >Shep WB Nimzo 2000b is few days older then CB Nimzo 7-32 ! (Information by Chrilly Donninger, Dutch-ch Leiden 99) New are the CMD endgame files in version 7-32 and very little changes ! Best Frank
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.