Author: Uri Blass
Date: 00:30:25 12/14/00
Go up one level in this thread
On December 13, 2000 at 23:38:41, Laurence Chen wrote: >In this position Shredder 5 played the losing move 36. h4??, it could have drawn >the game with the move 36. g3! It took Shredder at least 30 min. in my Pentium >III 600e with 128 MB Hash Table to evaluate the position as close to 0.00 >(-0.01), it took Hiarcs 7.32 a few seconds to find 36. g3!, however the >evaluation was -0.76. Perhaps Shredder 5 will benefit the most on a super fast >computer and at a longer time control. >[D]8/7p/3p2p1/4p3/P1k5/8/4KPPP/8 w - - 0 36 I think that you are looking at the wrong position. I am not sure if 36.h4 is losing. Shredder could probably save the game later by 40.f5 [D]8/7p/6p1/3p4/P3pPPP/2k1K3/8/8 w - - 0 1 A possible line is 40.f5 d4+ 41.Kxe4 d3 42.f6 d2 43.f7 d1Q 44.f8Q and I believe that it is a draw. I guess that shredder was cheated in this game when yout p600 started to behave like 286 for some unknown reason(otherwise I cannot understand the fact that shredder got only depth 6) Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.