Author: Laurence Chen
Date: 05:15:47 12/14/00
Go up one level in this thread
On December 14, 2000 at 04:33:27, Ingo Bauer wrote: >On December 14, 2000 at 03:14:42, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On December 13, 2000 at 21:29:50, Laurence Chen wrote: >> >>>I tested Shredder 5 against Gambit Tiger using two Pentium III 600e computers, >>>time control 40'/40. Shredder had 128 MB Hash Table, with 32 MB Cache for >>>Tablebases (5 men tbs), and Gambit Tiger had 96 MB of Hash Table. The 20 game >>>match final score was: >>>S5 W+5 D=7 L-8 8.5/20 >>>GT W+8 D=7 L-5 11.5/20 > >>Something here seems to be wrong. >> >>Are you sure that shredder5 can get only to depth 6 after 42 seconds? >> >>I see no way to see +6.71 at depth 6 unless the program is similiar to crafty >>and even Crafty can avoid 40.a5 at bigger depthes and it takes crafty less than >>a second to get bigger depthes on p200. >> > >Yes you are right. Something is wrong!!!!! >On my Celeron 855 S5 shows on the 40th move imediately a depth of ->9<-. After >42 seconds S5 is on 15/27 and want to play f5 with a score of -0.22. > >Bye Ingo Bauer Alright then, I'll run another 20 games match with 96 MB Hash Table. Hope this will solve the problem. I find strange that 128 MB Hash can cause this type of side effect. I have 320 MB of RAM, running Windows ME. Regards, Laurence
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.