Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: chess solved

Author: Bruce Moreland

Date: 09:36:38 12/14/00

Go up one level in this thread


On December 13, 2000 at 19:26:20, Robin Smith wrote:

>On December 13, 2000 at 13:33:55, Bruce Moreland wrote:
>
>>On December 13, 2000 at 12:50:16, walter irvin wrote:
>>
>>>would most people considder chess to be solved if a computer had an oppening
>>>database that always left the computer +2.50 when it was out of book and not
>>>ever permitting the blocking of position??? with best play does anyone believe
>>>that black does not lose ?? also if 100% represents the total number of legal
>>>positions then what % make up positions that could SAFELY be reached vs strong
>>>opposition ???(3% perhaps)and if that is the case then should that not be the
>>>positions to solve???
>>
>>There is no guarantee that this would solve chess, but the odds would be high
>>that there is at least one forced win if white can force a +2.5 computer
>>evaluation from the root.
>
>The likelyhood of chess being a win for white, with perfect play from both
>sides, is very low.  This is born out by computer-computer games, where the draw
>percentage increases as search depth/time increases and also by the fact that
>super GM vs. super GM games have a much higher draw rate than games by lower
>rated players.  In both cases as playing strength increases the percentage of
>draws also increases.  Strong evidence that chess is a draw.  Also, in decisive
>games one almost invariably finds that one of the players either made a mistake
>or mistakes, or at the very least took unneccesary risks.  And most strong
>chesspayers believe a perfectly played game should end in a draw.  When Kasparov
>was once asked why he did not win a particular game he replied "Chess is a draw,
>no?".
>
>So, there will NEVER be any computer opening database, no matter how big, where
>computers (playing white) think the 1st position out of book is always at least
>+2.50 for the computer .... unless the computer has a seriously flawed
>evaluation, in which case it will hardly mean chess is solved.
>
>Robin Smith

I agree with you.  I was answering most of the question as posed.

bruce




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.