Author: Amir Ban
Date: 03:54:01 01/22/98
Go up one level in this thread
On January 22, 1998 at 05:04:43, Howard Exner wrote: >On January 21, 1998 at 14:24:23, Ernst A. Heinz wrote: > >ECM16 Sokol'skij vs Botvinnik (may be a variation as not all ECM >examples >were actual game moves) >1... Rxc5 2.Bxc5 Nf3 3.gxf3 Bxf3 4.Qc2 Bxd1 5.Qxd1 Qg5 -+ >This is what the book says but you can clearly see the entire line >is flawed. Nf3? Qc2? > Right. 3... Bxf3? 4. Be7 makes black feel really stupid. So there's no combination here. >ECM99: Miranovic vs Gorev >1.Qxd5! Rxd5 2.Nf6 Kh8 3.Bg5! Kg7 4.Rh7 Kf8 5.Rh8 Ke7 6.Nd5 +- >Again your programs will expose the flaws in this one also. > Here I disagree. 1... Rxd5 is suicide, but that only proves that the key is correct. It does take a piece, no ? If the defender has to decline a sacrifice then it's correct. Amir
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.