Author: Ed Schröder
Date: 07:12:59 12/15/00
Go up one level in this thread
On December 15, 2000 at 07:09:48, stuart taylor wrote: >On December 15, 2000 at 04:59:58, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On December 15, 2000 at 02:47:33, Terry Ripple wrote: >> >>>On December 15, 2000 at 02:15:45, Jouni Uski wrote: >>> >>>>After this kind of result I guess Rebel will NOT be SSDF number 1. >>>>Games available at: http://home.bip.net/gunnar.blomstrand/index.htm >>>> >>>>Jouni >>>------------- >>>Was this time control 40 moves/2 hours? Century 3.0 i believe benefits from the >>>slower time control! >>> >>>Regards,Terry >> >>Yes >>It was tournament time control. >> >>I believe that all programs play better at slower time control. >> >>The main question is if Rebel century3 had not problems with the autoplayer. >>Checking the games manually can help to solve this question but I have no time >>to do it. >> >>Uri > >You see? This is what can happen (assuming it is correct)! Two generations CAN >see no true improvement. Even if Rebel century3 is better than Junior 6a (if it >is), it might be for other reasons, e.g. that the book was designed against 6a, >and not against 5.0.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >S.Taylor It could be this it could be that, it could be, and and and... Fact is your reasoning is wrong and easy to check. Just run a match Century 3 - Junior 6a with an older Rebel book (they are all on the Rebel 11 cdrom) and you will get similar results. Also run Century 1 vs Century 3 and use whatever equal book and you will see what happens to poor Century 1. Ed
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.