Author: Marc van Hal
Date: 12:06:38 12/15/00
Go up one level in this thread
On December 15, 2000 at 10:12:59, Ed Schröder wrote: >On December 15, 2000 at 07:09:48, stuart taylor wrote: > >>On December 15, 2000 at 04:59:58, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On December 15, 2000 at 02:47:33, Terry Ripple wrote: >>> >>>>On December 15, 2000 at 02:15:45, Jouni Uski wrote: >>>> >>>>>After this kind of result I guess Rebel will NOT be SSDF number 1. >>>>>Games available at: http://home.bip.net/gunnar.blomstrand/index.htm >>>>> >>>>>Jouni >>>>------------- >>>>Was this time control 40 moves/2 hours? Century 3.0 i believe benefits from the >>>>slower time control! >>>> >>>>Regards,Terry >>> >>>Yes >>>It was tournament time control. >>> >>>I believe that all programs play better at slower time control. >>> >>>The main question is if Rebel century3 had not problems with the autoplayer. >>>Checking the games manually can help to solve this question but I have no time >>>to do it. >>> >>>Uri >> >>You see? This is what can happen (assuming it is correct)! Two generations CAN >>see no true improvement. Even if Rebel century3 is better than Junior 6a (if it >>is), it might be for other reasons, e.g. that the book was designed against 6a, >>and not against 5.0.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >>S.Taylor > >It could be this it could be that, it could be, and and and... > >Fact is your reasoning is wrong and easy to check. Just run a match Century 3 >- Junior 6a with an older Rebel book (they are all on the Rebel 11 cdrom) and >you will get similar results. Also run Century 1 vs Century 3 and use whatever >equal book and you will see what happens to poor Century 1. > >Ed But do the same thing with Rebel century against my alekhine personelety and the favour is just as big (if not bigger)for Alekhine then for Rebel Century3 versus Rebel Century1
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.