Author: Timothy J. Frohlick
Date: 16:54:20 12/15/00
Go up one level in this thread
Dear CCC, Most of us here at CCC like the SSDF list. It is only a guide and does not represent the whole amount of information about chess programs. I still like MChessPro 7 and 8 even though those programs are much weaker than ChessTiger 13 or The King v.3.x . and end up low on the SSDF rating list. If Rebel Century 3.0 gets less than first place it doesn't matter because it is a fun program with a great database function plus an 800,000 game collection. In the USA we have what is known as free speech. Furthermore, by being on this site we have waived any rights to legal remedies for slander. If we don't like having our pet projects be verbally assaulted then we should go elsewhere. So I think that it would be good for Ed and any other chess programmer to get their programs rated on the SSDF. More important than raw strength is the good will and friendly service of an honest man. Tim Frohlick On December 15, 2000 at 19:16:05, Bertil Eklund wrote: >On December 15, 2000 at 18:57:59, ERIQ wrote: > >>I understand that the two have a history And I'm still surprised >>that rebel has decided to try involving themselves with the list again. >> >>Now I wonder does Mr. Schroder Know the first rule in dealing w/ the devil ?? >> >> 1st. "Don't" >> >>I may not have the proof of any wrong doing, or unfair testing, but >>I do think that their list could & should be more accurate than it is >>and I'll leave it at that. This is my last post on this subject. >> >>If I have offended anyone, well It was not my intent. sorry you feel that way. > >Of course your intention wasn't yo offend anyone. Dealing with the the devil and >cheating. Only a joke behind a signature without a real name. Very funny, maybee >you have your own list corresponding to your position in this? > >Bertil
This page took 0.02 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.