Author: Ed Schröder
Date: 23:53:40 12/15/00
Go up one level in this thread
On December 15, 2000 at 20:57:56, ERIQ wrote: >In reading your post I tended to agree w/ most of what you said. > >However I can't help but think that ed.'s decision to play his program >against human masters rather than relying on the ssdf list was a good >idea that should be followed by all. And that somehow going back to >it may not be benificial at all. I really feel he has nothing to gain >and perhaps something to lose. As some people take the list not as a general >guide but as the word of God. > > sign, > Eriq There is nothing that comes with the program that forbids SSDF to include Rebel Century 3 in their list. When SSDF received the Rebel 11 cocktail I was kindly asked to give my permission for Century 3. I replied in the sense that there are no objections from my side. I suggested to read chapter 5.8 of the manual first and then make their own decision to include Century 3 in the SSDF list or not. One thing is clear to me, people want to see Rebel compete over there despite the buggy autoplayer. These are my most loyal customers and if they want it they can get it. I know I have said different in the past (Rebel 10) but I have changed my mind. After all it is not the customer's fault the autoplayer is buggy and I can't solve the problem. Ed
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.