Author: Chessfun
Date: 09:58:21 12/16/00
Go up one level in this thread
On December 16, 2000 at 12:45:33, Ed Schröder wrote: >On December 16, 2000 at 11:18:04, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On December 16, 2000 at 11:00:12, Andreas St. wrote: >> >>>On December 16, 2000 at 10:11:31, Uri Blass wrote: >>> >>>>[D]4rrk1/5ppp/p2b4/1p1Q1b2/3P4/2P3Pq/PP1B1P1P/RN2R1K1 b - - 0 1 >>>> >>>>The problem is to find Bf4 >>>> >>>>I tried 2 programs Chessmaster6000(ss=10) and Gambittiger and both of them found >>>>Bf4 in less than an hour on my pIII450 >>>> >>>>Chessmaster6000 needed 18 minutes and 31 seconds when Gambittiger needed more >>>>time but less than an hour(I do not remember the exact time). >>>> >>>>Is there a program that is better than the old program chessmaster6000 in >>>>finding Bf4? >>>> >>>>I am interested in the results of Deep Fritz and Chessmaster8000 >>>> >>>>Uri >>> >>> >>>Hi, >>> >>>again i see as always default settings in Chessmaster 6000/7000 arent very good. >> >>ss=10 is not the default setting for chessmaster(ss=6 is the default). >> >>I know that tests did not prove significant difference between >>chessmaster6000(ss=10) and other personalities. >> >>It is possible that chessmaster6555 is better at test positions(I do not know) >>but there is no clear evidence which personality is better in games. >> >>Uri > >I am sure I am missing something. Bf4 looks like a horrible positional >blunder (1..Bxf4). If 1....Bf4. 2 Bxf4 Rxe1 mate. Sarah What is the point of Bf4? > >Ed
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.