Author: Ed Schröder
Date: 13:22:39 12/16/00
Go up one level in this thread
On December 16, 2000 at 14:29:34, Terry Ripple wrote: >Hi Ed, > >Will Century 3 learn from any bad move it makes in a game and not make the same >mistake in it's next game? In principle yes only that the learning frequency is set very low. This to avoid the book becomes too narrow after 10-20 games and you only see Rebel trying to repeat its won games. >I was reading your claim that using Anti-Grandmaster=Smart in the games against >Anand was the main reason for it's wins, so can i assume that to use this >setting against all strong "human" opponents would be the strongest? You can safely use the anti-GM=Smart setting in your games. It will be practiced against GM v/d Wiel too. I don't think the anti-GM setting makes Rebel a stronger player, it is meant to confuse the strong human player, avoid closed position, make sure to get (or hold) the initiative. anti-GM is certainly not meant as playing the best move all the time. >Can you give a brief explanation for the use of "Active", "Strong" and "Smart"? That is a long story. Have a look at: http://www.rebel.nl/rebel10.htm >Thankyou in advance for your answers! You are most welcome. Ed >Best regards, >Terry
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.