Author: stuart taylor
Date: 18:37:59 12/16/00
Go up one level in this thread
On December 15, 2000 at 10:12:59, Ed Schröder wrote: >On December 15, 2000 at 07:09:48, stuart taylor wrote: > >>On December 15, 2000 at 04:59:58, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On December 15, 2000 at 02:47:33, Terry Ripple wrote: >>> >>>>On December 15, 2000 at 02:15:45, Jouni Uski wrote: >>>> >>>>>After this kind of result I guess Rebel will NOT be SSDF number 1. >>>>>Games available at: http://home.bip.net/gunnar.blomstrand/index.htm >>>>> >>>>>Jouni >>>>------------- >>>>Was this time control 40 moves/2 hours? Century 3.0 i believe benefits from the >>>>slower time control! >>>> >>>>Regards,Terry >>> >>>Yes >>>It was tournament time control. >>> >>>I believe that all programs play better at slower time control. >>> >>>The main question is if Rebel century3 had not problems with the autoplayer. >>>Checking the games manually can help to solve this question but I have no time >>>to do it. >>> >>>Uri >> >>You see? This is what can happen (assuming it is correct)! Two generations CAN >>see no true improvement. Even if Rebel century3 is better than Junior 6a (if it >>is), it might be for other reasons, e.g. that the book was designed against 6a, >>and not against 5.0.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >>S.Taylor > >It could be this it could be that, it could be, and and and... > >Fact is your reasoning is wrong and easy to check. Just run a match Century 3 >- Junior 6a with an older Rebel book (they are all on the Rebel 11 cdrom) and >you will get similar results. Also run Century 1 vs Century 3 and use whatever >equal book and you will see what happens to poor Century 1. > >Ed If so, good! But let's test everything though. Stalor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.