Author: Bertil Eklund
Date: 05:15:10 12/17/00
Go up one level in this thread
On December 17, 2000 at 07:16:01, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >On December 17, 2000 at 06:07:18, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On December 17, 2000 at 05:57:49, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>I am interested to know which program is best in this secret test >>>What are the results of the following programs: >>> >>>1)Deep Fritz(Does it have better result than Fritz6a) >>>2)Chessmaster8000 >>>3)Tiger13 >>>4)Gambittiger >>>5)Century3 >>>6)Gandalf4.32g >>> >>>I am interested to know the number of correct solutions at different time limit >>>to get an impression which program earn most from time(the program that earns >>>more solutions when the time limit is increased is probably the program that >>>earns most from time) >>> >>>Uri >> >>I forgot Shredder5. >>It will be interesting to know if your test supports the claim that Shredder5 >>earns more from time. >> >>Uri > >As I posted before, I didn't get my copy of S5 yet. > >I used to be quite skeptical about the claim that some programs must play at >slow time controls in order to do their best relative to others, but in the >games I played last Summer with Shredder 4.22 it did clearly better at the slow >London time controls than at 40/20. On the other hand, Bertil posted that >Shredder does very well at blitz, and if there is a tester I trust as much as >myself this is Bertil, so... Also Gandalf 4.32g performs much better in my games >at slow time controls, while the different flavors of Fritz and Tiger couldn't >care less, and Hiarcs 7.32 is better at blitz than at 40/120. Just to make the >life of testers easy. :) > >Enrique Hi! and thanks! Yes I have played more than 1000 blitz-games with S4 and it plays about the same level in blitz as Hiarcs7.32, Junior6, Tiger12. Slightly better than N7 and slightly weaker than F6. Bertil
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.