Author: Ulrich Tuerke
Date: 07:37:28 12/18/00
Go up one level in this thread
On December 18, 2000 at 09:39:19, Tim Foden wrote: >On December 18, 2000 at 07:46:55, Ulrich Tuerke wrote: > >>Forget my remarks. If this was your problem, you would probably not reach so >>high iterations. (Comet ususally solves this on iteration #18.) >>I guess that rather your algo has a bug. > >I think you may well be right. I could try stripping *everything* out of the >search and the evaluation function, except the hash table and material >evaluation. > >Should the FINE 70 position still be solved with such a search? > >> >>Sorry, Uli > >No problem... any ideas are appreciated. :) > >Cheers, Tim. I should rather think that it's the hashing itself which could make the problem. My 1st idea is that you could make a mistake regarding bounds. May be you store a bound as an exact value, or you read a bound and interprete as exact ? Perhaps it's worthwhile to test what happens if you store and read exact values only. Uli
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.