Author: Stuart Cracraft
Date: 13:14:53 01/22/98
Go up one level in this thread
On January 22, 1998 at 14:39:12, Bruce Moreland wrote: > >On January 22, 1998 at 14:13:40, Stuart Cracraft wrote: > >>In other words, retain the tactical cruncher aspect of >>the program. But when two moves are approximately equal >>tactically, based on the score, use the pattern matching >>to break the tie. > >Lots of guys have suggested climbing this Everest, or a siimilar one. > >1) Find the mountain. >2) Find a sherpa. >3) Climb the mountain. > >Everyone seems to stop somewhere before step 3 is started. > >Some problems are: > >1) Identifying which patterns might exist in general. >2) Figuring out that one (or which one) might apply in this position. > >These are both really really hard, aren't they? > >bruce You forgot step 2a). "Get the oxygen canisters". That's what makes this kind of pattern-matching interesting. The Russian Kaissa team had an idea of the "method of analogies". I wonder if that's been used more generally (or researched.) --Stuart
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 07 Jul 11 08:48:38 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.