Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Yet again: Hashing and FINE 70

Author: Bruce Moreland

Date: 09:42:57 12/18/00

Go up one level in this thread


On December 18, 2000 at 07:08:38, Tim Foden wrote:

>Hi All,
>
>I have recently been looking at lots of old posts (I've been mucking around
>with my own archive browser with better search functionality), and I keep
>coming across the FINE 70 position as a good test for a hash implementation.
>
>I have been worried about the hash code in GLC for a while now, but I haven't
>been able to track anything down that is wrong.  I'm not sure there _is_
>even anything wrong.
>
>But... on the FINE 70 position below, GLC takes ages to see the gain of the
>f5 pawn.

Here are some more ideas for experimentation.  If you can turn your hash table
completely off, see what that does.  Another thing to explore is what happens if
you leave your hash table on, but don't allow it to generate cutoffs.

I have done a lot of testing of this position over the years.  I use it as a
sanity check now and then, in order to see if I have broken hashing or if
various pruning experiments cause it to explode.

My first experience with it involved some output from Cray Blitz, which showed
it solving this in the 18th ply.

My own program completely bogged in the 18th ply, but didn't find it.  I
determined that this is what happened when my program had severe hashing bugs.

When I fixed these bugs my program went like blazes but it didn't solve the
problem until ply 26.  No big deal, that was only a couple of seconds.  I spent
some time trying to figure that out, and eventually decided that this didn't
matter.

Since then I have seen versions that solve it at various plies, usually in the
low to mid 20's.  You don't *have* to solve it in ply 18, but I think that
significant bogging is cause for alarm.

There was one point at which I made significant changes to my hashing situation,
and I noticed that this problem was very very succeptible to replacement
problems.  I use two tables, one of which is "store always", the other is "store
if deeper search or score not from this search".  That seems to solve the
problem pretty well.  If I use a single table instead, my program has serious
problems with this position.

I just tested it on a Pentium Pro 200, and it's finding it in ply 22 now, with
numerous false starts starting at ply 18, which isn't what it usually does.
Appended is output of a run for five seconds.

bruce

PV 00:00:00.010  1    176 [right] Kb1
PV 00:00:00.010  1    182 [wrong] Kb2
PV 00:00:00.010  2    170 [wrong] Kb2 Kb6
PV 00:00:00.010  3    182 [wrong] Kb2 Kb6 Kc3
PV 00:00:00.010  4    182 [wrong] Kb2 Kb6 Kc3 Kc7
PV 00:00:00.010  5    188 [wrong] Kb2 Kb6 Kc3 Kc7 Kd3
PV 00:00:00.010  6    182 [wrong] Kb2 Kb6 Kc3 Kc7 Kd3 Kd7
PV 00:00:00.010  7    182 [wrong] Kb2 Kb6 Kc3 Kc7 Kd3 Kd7 Ke3
PV 00:00:00.020  8    188 [wrong] Kb2 Kb6 Kc3 Kc7 Kc4 Kb6 Kd3 Kc7
PV 00:00:00.020  9    188 [wrong] Kb2 Kb6 Kc3 Kc7 Kc4 Kb6 Kd3 Kc7 Ke3
PV 00:00:00.020 10    182 [wrong] Kb2 Kb6 Kc3 Kc7 Kc4 Kb6 Kd3 Kc7 Ke3 Kd7
PV 00:00:00.030 11    182 [wrong] Kb2 Kb6 Kc3 Kc7 Kc4 Kb6 Kd3 Kc7 Ke3 Kd7 Kd3
PV 00:00:00.030 12    182 [wrong] Kb2 Kb6 Kc3 Kc7 Kc4 Kb6 Kd3 Kc7 Kc3 Kb7 Kd2
Kc7
PV 00:00:00.040 13    182 [wrong] Kb2 Kb6 Kc3 Kc7 Kc4 Kb6 Kd3 Kc7 Kc3 Kd7 Kc4
Ke7 Kd3
PV 00:00:00.050 14    182 [wrong] Kb2 Kb6 Kc3 Kc7 Kc4 Kb6 Kd3 Kc7 Kc3 Kb7 Kd2
Kc7 Ke3 Kd7
PV 00:00:00.050 15    182 [wrong] Kb2 Kb6 Kc3 Kc7 Kc4 Kb6 Kd3 Kc7 Kc3 Kb7 Kd2
Kc7 Ke3 Kd7 Kd3
PV 00:00:00.060 16    182 [wrong] Kb2 Kb6 Kc3 Kc7 Kc4 Kb6 Kd3 Kc7 Kc3 Kb7 Kc2
Kc7 Kd3
PV 00:00:00.060 17    182 [wrong] Kb2 Kb6 Kc3 Kc7 Kc4 Kb6 Kd3 Kc7 Kc3 Kb7 Kc2
Kc7 Kd3 Kb7 Ke3 Kc7 Kf3
PV 00:00:00.100 18    176 [wrong] Kb2 Ka8 Kc2 Kb8 Kd3 Kc7
PV 00:00:00.100 18    179 [right] Kb1
PV 00:00:00.100 18    232 [right] Kb1
PV 00:00:00.110 18    176 [wrong] Kb2 Ka8 Kc2 Kb8 Kd3 Kc7
PV 00:00:00.120 19    176 [wrong] Kb2 Ka8 Kc2 Kb8 Kd3 Kc7 Kc4
PV 00:00:00.130 19    179 [right] Kb1
PV 00:00:00.130 19    176 [wrong] Kb2 Ka8 Kc2 Kb8 Kd3 Kc7 Kc4
PV 00:00:00.140 20    176 [wrong] Kb2 Ka8 Kc2 Kb8 Kd3 Kc7 Kc4 Kb6 Kc3
PV 00:00:00.160 20    179 [right] Kb1
PV 00:00:00.160 20    176 [wrong] Kb2 Ka8 Kc2 Kb8 Kd3 Kc7 Kc4 Kb6 Kc3
PV 00:00:00.170 21    176 [wrong] Kb2 Ka8 Kc2 Kb8 Kd3 Kc7 Kc4 Kb6 Kc3
PV 00:00:00.190 21    179 [right] Kb1
PV 00:00:00.190 21    176 [wrong] Kb2 Ka8 Kc2 Kb8 Kd3 Kc7 Kc4 Kb6 Kc3
PV 00:00:00.200 22    176 [wrong] Kb2 Ka8 Kc2 Kb8 Kd3 Kc7 Kc4 Kb6 Kc3
PV 00:00:00.220 22    179 [right] Kb1
PV 00:00:00.250 22    226 [right] Kb1
PV 00:00:00.270 22    348 [right] Kb1 Kb7 Kc1 Kc7 Kd1 Kd7 Kc2 Kc7 Kd3 Kb7 Ke3
Kc7 Kf3 Kd7 Kg3 Ke7 Kh4 Kf6 Kh5 Kf7 Kg5 Ke7
PV 00:00:00.290 23    348 [right] Kb1 Kb7 Kc1 Kc7 Kd1 Kd7 Kc2 Kc7 Kd3 Kb7 Ke3
Kc7 Kf3 Kd7 Kg3 Ke7 Kh4 Kf6 Kh5 Kf7 Kg5 Ke7 Kxf5
PV 00:00:00.330 24    353 [right] Kb1 Kb7 Kc1 Kc7 Kd1 Kd7 Kc2 Kc7 Kd3 Kb7 Ke3
Kc7 Kf3 Kd7 Kg3 Ke7 Kh4 Kf6 Kh5 Kf7 Kg5 Ke8 Kxf5 Ke7
PV 00:00:00.401 25    368 [right] Kb1 Kb7 Kc1 Kc7 Kd1 Kd7 Kc2 Kc7 Kd3 Kb7 Ke3
Kc7 Kf3 Kd7 Kg3 Ke7 Kh4 Kf6 Kh5 Kf7 Kg5 Ke8 Kxf5 Kf7 Kg4
PV 00:00:00.451 26    357 [right] Kb1 Kb7 Kc1 Kc7 Kd1 Kd7 Kc2 Kc7 Kd3 Kb7 Ke3
Kc7 Kf3 Kd7 Kg3 Ke7 Kh4 Kf6 Kh5 Kf7 Kg5 Ke8 Kxf5 Kf7 Kg4 Kf6
PV 00:00:00.551 27    388 [right] Kb1 Kb7 Kc1 Kc7 Kd1 Kd7 Kc2 Kc7 Kd3 Kb7 Ke3
Kc7 Kf3 Kd7 Kg3 Ke7 Kh4 Kf6 Kh5 Kf7 Kg5 Ke8 Kxf5 Kf7 Kg4 Kf6 f5
PV 00:00:00.641 28    388 [right] Kb1 Kb7 Kc1 Kc7 Kd1 Kd7 Kc2 Kc7 Kd3 Kb7 Ke3
Kc7 Kf3 Kd7 Kg3 Ke7 Kh4 Kf6 Kh5 Kf7 Kg5 Ke8 Kxf5 Kf7 Kg4 Kf6 f5 Ke7
PV 00:00:00.831 29    428 [right] Kb1 Kb7 Kc1 Kc7 Kd1 Kd7 Kc2 Kc7 Kd3 Kb7 Ke3
Kc7 Kf3 Kd7 Kg3 Ke7 Kh4 Kf6 Kh5 Kf7 Kg5 Ke8 Kxf5 Kf7 Kg5 Kf8 f5 Ke7 f6+ Ke8
PV 00:00:01.142 30    434 [right] Kb1 Kb7 Kc1 Kc7 Kd1 Kd7 Kc2 Kc7 Kd3 Kb7 Ke3
Kc7 Kf3 Kd7 Kg3 Ke7 Kh4 Kf6 Kh5 Kf7 Kg5 Ke8 Kxf5 Kf7 Kg5 Ke7 f5 Kd7 f6 Ke8
PV 00:00:01.402 31    434 [right] Kb1 Kb7 Kc1 Kc7 Kd1 Kd7 Kc2 Kc7 Kd3 Kb7 Ke3
Kc7 Kf3 Kd7 Kg3 Ke7 Kh4 Kf6 Kh5 Kf7 Kg5 Ke8 Kxf5 Kf7 Kg5 Ke7 f5 Kd7 f6 Ke8 Kf5
PV 00:00:01.783 32    434 [right] Kb1 Kb7 Kc1 Kc7 Kd1 Kd7 Kc2 Kc7 Kd3 Kb7 Ke3
Kc7 Kf3 Kd7 Kg3 Ke7 Kh4 Kf6 Kh5 Kf7 Kg5 Ke8 Kxf5 Kf7 Kg5 Ke7 f5 Kd7 f6 Ke8 Kf5
Kf7
PV 00:00:02.574 33    434 [right] Kb1 Kb7 Kc1 Kc7 Kd1 Kd7 Kc2 Kc7 Kd3 Kb7 Ke3
Kc7 Kf3 Kd7 Kg3 Ke7 Kh4 Kf6 Kh5 Kf7 Kg5 Ke7 Kxf5 Kf7
PV 00:00:03.695 34    434 [right] Kb1 Kb7 Kc1 Kc7 Kd1 Kd7 Kc2 Kc7 Kd3 Kb7 Ke3
Kc7 Kf3 Kd7 Kg3 Ke7 Kh4 Kf6 Kh5 Kf7 Kg5 Ke7 Kxf5 Kf7 Kg5 Kg7 f5 Kf7 f6 Kf8 Kg4
Kg8 Kf4 Kf7


>
>So I am asking (grovel grovel) for people's help here...
>
>Looking at the analysis below, does it look like there is a bug, or is this
>just a normal posibility in a valid implementation?  I am concerned for the
>number of nodes taked to finish 24 ply (after 2:21), and again at 26 ply
>(after 22:23; where it finally sees the pawn capture).
>
>If there is a bug, does anyone have a good idea how I should go about
>finding it?  Or even a bad one? ;)
>
>Are there any other (simpler... where I can dump the tree an look at it
>myself) positions that also test the hash table in this way?
>
>Does GLC find the correct PV?  If not, what is the correct PV for the
>solution to this position?
>
>Thanks in advance for any help... it will be much appreciated.
>
>Cheers, Tim.
>
><<<<<<<<<<<<
>Program output below:
>
>>fen /k/3p/p2P1p/P2P1P///K/ w
>   _a___b___c___d___e___f___g___h_
>  |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |     White to play
> 8|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |8
>  |___|___|___|___|___|___|___|___|
>  |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
> 7|(K)|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |7
>  |___|___|___|___|___|___|___|___|
>  |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
> 6|   |   |   |(P)|   |   |   |   |6
>  |___|___|___|___|___|___|___|___|
>  |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
> 5|(P)|   |   | P |   |(P)|   |   |5
>  |___|___|___|___|___|___|___|___|
>  |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
> 4| P |   |   | P |   | P |   |   |4
>  |___|___|___|___|___|___|___|___|
>  |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
> 3|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |3
>  |___|___|___|___|___|___|___|___|
>  |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
> 2|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |2
>  |___|___|___|___|___|___|___|___|
>  |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
> 1| K |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |1
>  |___|___|___|___|___|___|___|___|
>    a   b   c   d   e   f   g   h
>>hash 24
> Hash table size set to: 24.0MB
>>anal
> Game stage: Endgame
> Current eval: 0.99
> Ply  Time  Score   Nodes  Principal Variation
>  1   0.00   1.00       1  Kb1
>  1   0.01   1.05       4  Kb2
>  1   0.01   1.05       4  Kb2
>  2   0.01   0.99      12  Kb2 Kb6
>  2   0.01   0.99      18  Kb2 Kb6
>  3   0.01   1.05      47  Kb2 Kb6 Kc3
>  3   0.01   1.05      61  Kb2 Kb6 Kc3
>  4   0.01   1.05     108  Kb2 Kb6 Kc3 Kc7
>  4   0.01   1.05     130  Kb2 Kb6 Kc3 Kc7
>  5   0.01   1.06     232  Kb2 Kb6 Kc3 Kc7 Kd3
>  5   0.01   1.06     303  Kb2 Kb6 Kc3 Kc7 Kd3
>  6   0.01   1.05     453  Kb2 Kb6 Kc3 Kc7 Kd3 Kd7
>  6   0.01   1.05     514  Kb2 Kb6 Kc3 Kc7 Kd3 Kd7
>  7   0.01   1.05     761  Kb2 Kb6 Kc3 Kc7 Kd3 Kd7 Ke3
>  7   0.02   1.05     828  Kb2 Kb6 Kc3 Kc7 Kd3 Kd7 Ke3
>  8   0.02   1.06    1366  Kb2 Kb6 Kc3 Kc7 Kc4 Kb6 Kd3 Kc7
>  8   0.02   1.06    1427  Kb2 Kb6 Kc3 Kc7 Kc4 Kb6 Kd3 Kc7
>  9   0.02   1.06    1868  Kb2 Kb6 Kc3 Kc7 Kc4 Kb6 Kd3 Kc7 Kc4
>  9   0.02   1.06    1929  Kb2 Kb6 Kc3 Kc7 Kc4 Kb6 Kd3 Kc7 Kc4
> 10   0.03   1.05    3162  Kb2 Kb6 Kc3 Kc7 Kc4 Kb6 Kd3 Kc7 Ke3 Kd7
> 10   0.03   1.05    3225  Kb2 Kb6 Kc3 Kc7 Kc4 Kb6 Kd3 Kc7 Ke3 Kd7
> 11   0.03   1.05    4048  Kb2 Kb6 Kc3 Kc7 Kc4 Kb6 Kd3 Kc7 Ke3 Kd7 Kd3
> 11   0.05   1.05    4109  Kb2 Kb6 Kc3 Kc7 Kc4 Kb6 Kd3 Kc7 Ke3 Kd7 Kd3
> 12   0.06   1.05    5517  Kb2 Kb6 Kc3 Kc7 Kc4 Kb6 Kd3 Kc7 Ke3 Kd7 Kd3 Ke7
> 12   0.06   1.05    5578  Kb2 Kb6 Kc3 Kc7 Kc4 Kb6 Kd3 Kc7 Ke3 Kd7 Kd3 Ke7
> 13   0.07   1.05    7139  Kb2 Kb6 Kc3 Kc7 Kc4 Kb6 Kd3 Kc7 Ke3 Kd7 Kd2 Ke7 Kd3
> 13   0.07   1.05    7200  Kb2 Kb6 Kc3 Kc7 Kc4 Kb6 Kd3 Kc7 Ke3 Kd7 Kd2 Ke7 Kd3
> 14   0.08   1.05    9855  Kb2 Kb6 Kc3 Kc7 Kc4 Kb6 Kd3 Kc7 Ke3 Kd7 Kd2 Kc7 Kd3
>                           Kd7
> 14   0.09   1.05    9916  Kb2 Kb6 Kc3 Kc7 Kc4 Kb6 Kd3 Kc7 Ke3 Kd7 Kd2 Kc7 Kd3
>                           Kd7
> 15   0.11   1.05   13879  Kb2 Kb6 Kc3 Kc7 Kc4 Kb6 Kd3 Kc7 Ke3 Kd7 Kd2 Kd8 Kc2
>                           Kd7 Kd3
> 15   0.11   1.05   13940  Kb2 Kb6 Kc3 Kc7 Kc4 Kb6 Kd3 Kc7 Ke3 Kd7 Kd2 Kd8 Kc2
>                           Kd7 Kd3
> 16   0.15   1.05   23710  Kb2 Kb6 Kc3 Kc7 Kc4 Kb6 Kd3 Kc7 Ke3 Kd7 Kd2 Kd8 Kc2
>                           Kc7 Kd3 Kd7
> 16   0.16   1.05   23771  Kb2 Kb6 Kc3 Kc7 Kc4 Kb6 Kd3 Kc7 Ke3 Kd7 Kd2 Kd8 Kc2
>                           Kc7 Kd3 Kd7
> 17   0.24   1.05   39553  Kb2 Kb6 Kc3 Kc7 Kc4 Kb6 Kd3 Kc7 Ke3 Kd7 Kd2 Kd8 Kc2
>                           Kd7 Kb2 Kc7 Kc3
> 17   0.24   1.05   39614  Kb2 Kb6 Kc3 Kc7 Kc4 Kb6 Kd3 Kc7 Ke3 Kd7 Kd2 Kd8 Kc2
>                           Kd7 Kb2 Kc7 Kc3
> 18   1.19   1.05  254909  Kb2 Ka8 Kc3 Kb7 <ht>
> 18   1.19   1.05  255124  Kb2 Ka8 Kc3 Kb7 <ht>
> 19   1.21   1.05  257733  Kb2 Ka8 Kc3 Kb7 Kc4 Kb6 Kd3 Kc7 Kc4 <ht>
> 19   5.50   1.06 1168840  Kb1 Kb7 Kc1 Kb8 Kc2 Kc8 Kd2 Kd7 Kc3 Kc7 Kb3 Kb6 Kc4
>                           Ka6 Kd3 Kb7 Ke3 Kc7 Kd3
> 19   5.56   1.06 1181133  Kb1 Kb7 Kc1 Kb8 Kc2 Kc8 Kd2 Kd7 Kc3 Kc7 Kb3 Kb6 Kc4
>                           Ka6 Kd3 Kb7 Ke3 Kc7 Kd3
> 20   7.51   1.05 1626804  Kb1 Kb7 Kc1 Kb8 Kc2 Kc8 Kd2 Kd7 Kc3 Kc7 Kd3 Kb7 Ke3
>                           Kc7 Kf3 Kd7 Ke2 Kd8 Kd3 Ke7
> 20   8.77   1.05 1923353  Kb1 Kb7 Kc1 Kb8 Kc2 Kc8 Kd2 Kd7 Kc3 Kc7 Kd3 Kb7 Ke3
>                           Kc7 Kf3 Kd7 Ke2 Kd8 Kd3 Ke7
> 21   9.22   1.05 2025144  Kb1 Kb7 Kc1 Kb8 Kc2 Kc8 Kd2 Kd7 Kc3 Kc7 Kd3 Kb7 Ke3
>                           Kc7 Kf3 Kd7 Ke2 Kd8 Kd3 Kd7 Kc4
> 21   9.23   1.05 2027301  Kb1 Kb7 Kc1 Kb8 Kc2 Kc8 Kd2 Kd7 Kc3 Kc7 Kd3 Kb7 Ke3
>                           Kc7 Kf3 Kd7 Ke2 Kd8 Kd3 Kd7 Kc4
> 22   9.26   1.05 2032028  Kb1 Kb7 Kc1 Kb8 Kc2 Kc8 Kd2 Kd7 Kc3 Kc7 Kd3 Kb7 Ke3
>                           Kc7 Kf3 Kd7 Ke2 Kd8 Kd3 Kc7 Kc4 Kd7
> 22  13.35   1.05 3011521  Kb1 Kb7 Kc1 Kb8 Kc2 Kc8 Kd2 Kd7 Kc3 Kc7 Kd3 Kb7 Ke3
>                           Kc7 Kf3 Kd7 Ke2 Kd8 Kd3 Kc7 Kc4 Kd7
> 23  13.40   1.05 3021288  Kb1 Kb7 Kc1 Kb8 Kc2 Kc8 Kd2 Kd7 Kc3 Kc7 Kd3 Kb7 Ke3
>                           Kc7 Kf3 Kd7 Kg3 Ke7 Kf2 Kf7 Ke3 Ke7 Kd3
> 23  15.81   1.05 3530404  Kb1 Kb7 Kc1 Kb8 Kc2 Kc8 Kd2 Kd7 Kc3 Kc7 Kd3 Kb7 Ke3
>                           Kc7 Kf3 Kd7 Kg3 Ke7 Kf2 Kf7 Ke3 Ke7 Kd3
> 24   2:21   1.05  25881k  Kb1 Kb7 Kc1 Kc7 Kd1 Kd8 Kc2 Kc8 Kd2 Kd7 Kc3 Kc7 Kd3
>                           Kb7 Ke3 Kc7 Kf3 Kd7 Ke2 Kd8 Kd3 Kc7 Kc4 Kd7
> 24   2:21   1.05  25895k  Kb1 Kb7 Kc1 Kc7 Kd1 Kd8 Kc2 Kc8 Kd2 Kd7 Kc3 Kc7 Kd3
>                           Kb7 Ke3 Kc7 Kf3 Kd7 Ke2 Kd8 Kd3 Kc7 Kc4 Kd7
> 25   2:21   1.05  25908k  Kb1 Kb7 Kc1 Kc7 Kd1 Kd8 Kc2 Kc8 Kd2 Kd7 Kc3 Kc7 Kd3
>                           Kb7 Ke3 Kc7 Kf3 Kd7 Kg3 Ke7 Kf2 Kf7 Ke3 Ke7 Kd3
> 25   2:22   1.05  25930k  Kb1 Kb7 Kc1 Kc7 Kd1 Kd8 Kc2 Kc8 Kd2 Kd7 Kc3 Kc7 Kd3
>                           Kb7 Ke3 Kc7 Kf3 Kd7 Kg3 Ke7 Kf2 Kf7 Ke3 Ke7 Kd3
> 26  11:47     ++ 127200k  Kb1     (a=0.55 b=1.55 e=1.55)
> 26  22:23   2.25 236793k  Kb1 Kb7 Kc1 Kc7 Kd1 Kd8 Kc2 Kc8 Kd2 Kd7 Kc3 Kc7 Kd3
>                           Kb7 Ke3 Kc7 Kf3 Kd7 Kg3 Ke7 Kh4 Kf6 Kh5 Ke7 Kg5 Kd7
> 26  22:23   2.25 236846k  Kb1 Kb7 Kc1 Kc7 Kd1 Kd8 Kc2 Kc8 Kd2 Kd7 Kc3 Kc7 Kd3
>                           Kb7 Ke3 Kc7 Kf3 Kd7 Kg3 Ke7 Kh4 Kf6 Kh5 Ke7 Kg5 Kd7
> 27  22:24   2.25 236874k  Kb1 Kb7 Kc1 Kc7 Kd1 Kd8 Kc2 Kc8 Kd2 Kd7 Kc3 Kc7 Kd3
>                           Kb7 Ke3 Kc7 Kf3 Kd7 Kg3 Ke7 Kh4 Kf6 Kh5 Ke7 Kg5 Kd7
>						   Kxf5
> 27  22:24   2.25 236980k  Kb1 Kb7 Kc1 Kc7 Kd1 Kd8 Kc2 Kc8 Kd2 Kd7 Kc3 Kc7 Kd3
>                           Kb7 Ke3 Kc7 Kf3 Kd7 Kg3 Ke7 Kh4 Kf6 Kh5 Ke7 Kg5 Kd7
>						   Kxf5
> 28  22:24   2.25 237025k  Kb1 Kb7 Kc1 Kc7 Kd1 Kd8 Kc2 Kc8 Kd2 Kd7 Kc3 Kc7 Kd3
>                           Kb7 Ke3 Kc7 Kf3 Kd7 Kg3 Ke7 Kh4 Kf6 Kh5 Ke7 Kg5 Kd7
>                           Kxf5 Ke7
> 28  22:26   2.25 237290k  Kb1 Kb7 Kc1 Kc7 Kd1 Kd8 Kc2 Kc8 Kd2 Kd7 Kc3 Kc7 Kd3
>                           Kb7 Ke3 Kc7 Kf3 Kd7 Kg3 Ke7 Kh4 Kf6 Kh5 Ke7 Kg5 Kd7
>                           Kxf5 Ke7
>>exit
> local:  t=23:03  nps=176410.9  n=244048445  (f=98419961  q=145628484)
> total:  t=23:03  nps=176410.9  n=244048445
> extensions:  check=268605  recap=3  p-push=16306  1-rep=2
> q-moves:  gen=911422  tested=907591  made/un=785685  max-dep=4
> max eval diff:  part-1=0.98  part-2=0.57
>>



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.