Author: Pete Galati
Date: 12:22:04 12/18/00
Go up one level in this thread
On December 18, 2000 at 14:32:32, Uri Blass wrote: >On December 18, 2000 at 14:01:57, Pete Galati wrote: > >>On December 18, 2000 at 12:01:55, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On December 18, 2000 at 11:24:41, Pete Galati wrote: >>> >>>>On December 18, 2000 at 11:11:50, Mogens Larsen wrote: >>>> >>>>>On December 18, 2000 at 10:45:16, Pete Galati wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>CSTal gets log files! Would you look at that CHESSBASE!!!!! I want log files, >>>>>>and I ain't buying another program from you guys till you give us log files. >>>>> >>>>>Just "clip analysis" during infinite analysis works just fine. Besides, I've >>>>>heard a rumour that some of the new native engines will support logging. >>>>> >>>>>Mogens. >>>> >>>>That's what I want, a log file, not clipping little chunks of analysis. Crafty >>>>makes a killer log file, the Dos Comet can generate a log file, LG too I think, >>>>oh, Phalanx, (several more WB engines!) So I don't think it's asking much at all >>>>for Chessbase to do it. I just don't get it, giant missing feature, and it >>>>would take very little to provide this IMO. >>>> >>>> >>>>Pete >>> >>>What do you mean by the word logfile? >> >>I want a file that contains everything that the program searched in the game, >>not just main lines of analysis, see >>http://site2936.dellhost.com/forums/1/message.shtml?145454 Peter Berger's post >>"Re: A tough position /Crafty tries" THAT's what I want Chessbase's programs to >>do. Crafty makes a new one for each game unless you turn the log off. >> >>This could be an option in their Engine Parameter dialog box. It's really >>something they should have in their interface, a LONG time ago. >> >>Pete > >I think that they have it a long time ago. > >The example in peter berger's post is only main lines of analysis at different >depthes and I saw a lot of cases when people posted similiar posts with their >chessbase engines. > >It was not important for me to know how to do it so I do not know how to post >Fritz's analysis but it is clearly possible. > >Uri I'm not sure what you've seen, what it probably was was that they right clicked in the analysis window and kept adding lines, and that's what they clipped, here's Junior after looking at it for a while with several lines added: New position [D]r5k1/1pqn3p/r4b2/p2p4/8/RP6/RP1BBPP1/3Q1K2 b - - 0 1 Analysis by Junior 6.0: 1. ± (1.09): 1...Qh2 2.Bxa6 Qh1+ 3.Ke2 Qxg2 4.b4 Re8+ 5.Re3 Rxe3+ 6.Bxe3 bxa6 7.bxa5 d4 8.Bh6 Be5 2. ² (0.64): 1...Re6 2.Bg4 Rea6 3.Qf3 Kg7 4.Qf5 Ne5 5.Be2 R6a7 6.Bh6+ Kxh6 7.Qxf6+ Ng6 8.Bd3 3. ± (1.02): 1...R6a7 2.Be3 d4 3.Bxd4 b6 4.Bc4+ Kh8 5.Be3 Qh2 6.Qd5 4. ± (1.33): 1...Rc6 2.Bb5 Rd6 3.Bxa5 Qc8 4.Bc4 Kh8 5. ± (1.33): 1...Rd6 2.Bxa5 6. +- (1.59): 1...b5 2.Bxb5 Rd6 3.Qg4+ Kh8 4.Rxa5 Rxa5 5.Rxa5 Nb8 6.Bf4 Qxa5 7.Bxd6 7. +- (1.69): 1...Rb6 2.Bxa5 Qh2 3.Qxd5+ Kh8 4.Qh5 Qxh5 5.Bxh5 Rba6 6.Bd2 Kg7 7.f4 8. +- (2.06): 1...Bg7 2.Bxa6 Rxa6 3.Bxa5 Qe5 4.Bb4 Nb8 5.Qg4 9. +- (2.11): 1...b6 2.Bxa6 10. +- (2.13): 1...Nf8 2.Bxa6 Rxa6 3.Bxa5 Qd6 4.Ra4 Ne6 5.Qg4+ Bg7 6.Qf5
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.