Author: stuart taylor
Date: 18:09:05 12/18/00
Go up one level in this thread
On December 18, 2000 at 09:10:35, James T. Walker wrote: >On December 18, 2000 at 06:46:41, stuart taylor wrote: > >>Ha! ha! ha! >>Maybe I can still use my old hiarcs another year without missing much (by way of >>deeper insight into games). >>S.Taylor > >Hello Stuart, >I think you can! I have always trusted Hiarcs for analysis because it is a very >good program. I'm still waiting for the new version. Don't get me wrong >though, I believe Shredder is stronger than Hiarcs 7.32. I now have 52 games of >Shredder 5 vs other top programs and it has a winning score of 29-23. Here is >what I have so far at Game/60 minutes on 2 K7-900 machines. > >Shredder5 vs Hiarcs 7.32 5-5 >Shredder5 vs Gambit Tiger 6.5-3.5 >Shredder5 vs Chess Tiger 6.5-3.5 >Shredder5 vs Fritz 6 5.5-6.5 (12 games) >Shredder5 vs Century 3.0 5-5 > Totals 29-23 >These are pretty good results against some of the best programs out there. I >don't think Hiarcs 7.32 can do that good. I still have to play CM8K and >Junior6. >Jim I was just starting to be sure that Chess Tiger was clearly on top. I still think it is, but no program is convincing enough yet, e.g. over here, Chess Tiger (forgetting GT) is much worse than Hiarcs, Fritz 6, and Century 3, which does not indicate you will find much instructive demonstration in the games played here, by chess tiger. Are you sure it was all fair and square? S.Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.