Author: Uri Blass
Date: 04:57:44 12/19/00
Go up one level in this thread
On December 19, 2000 at 06:52:08, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On December 18, 2000 at 22:58:06, James T. Walker wrote: > >>I wish I could agree with you guys but I can't. If you don't mind paying twice >>what would be a fair price then maybe you can be happy with it. I've had it a >>week now and I'm satisfied with it's strength at longer time controls. At >>Game/30 or less it seems to suffer from some unknown malady. > >It's not an especially fast program, around 160Knps on my Athlon, but quite >selective or so it seems. That could be a problem at faster timecontrols. It depends on the definition of being selective. If being selective means pruning moves at the root(moves that are good in 1 out of 1000 cases) then being selective can be a problem in longer time control because there are good moves that the program always prune when time is not going to help you. I know that one of the improvement in Rebel10 relative to Rebel9 was to do it less selective because it could not see some combinations. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.