Author: Enrique Irazoqui
Date: 07:37:25 12/19/00
Go up one level in this thread
On December 19, 2000 at 09:52:01, Josh Strayhorn wrote: > > >On December 19, 2000 at 08:46:23, Howard Exner wrote: > >>On December 19, 2000 at 08:15:56, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >> >>>On December 19, 2000 at 08:00:08, Laurence Chen wrote: >>> >>>>The drawish score is wrong. See (Enrique Irazoqui) Deep Fritz analysis after >>>>playing 1 ... Bg7!!. Black has a forced win. The key move is 4. ... Ned3! ( 1. >>>>... Bg7!!, 2. Ng1 Rxg3!, 3. Ne2 Rf3, 4. Ng1 Ned3!) which leads to a forced won >>>>endgame for Black. >>>>Regards, >>>>Laurence >>> >>>As Dan Andersson said, 4... c5+ is even better. That's the analysis of Deep >>>Fritz after 4.Ng1: >>> >>>New position >>>r5k1/ppp3bp/3p4/3Pn3/1n1KP1p1/1P3r2/PBB4R/R2Q2N1 b - - 0 1 >>> >*snip* >> >>But then Josh's idea of e5 ! first instead of Kc4 >>prolongs the game. I prefer your original analysis >>of omitting c5+ and just going with Ne3+. >> >>>b5+ 7.Kxb5 Rb8+ 8.Ka4 Nxb2+ 9.Ka3 Nxd1 10.Rxd1 >>> -+ (-2.16) Depth: 16/46 00:49:25 5737582kN >>> >>>(Irazoqui, Cadaqués 19.12.2000) > >Interesting. The line with Rxg3 is definitely an improvement. However, I think >White may still be able to hold this. > >I'm looking at the position after 26. ... Bg7 27. Ng1 Rxg3 28. Ne2 Rf3 29. Ng1 >c5+ 30. dxc6 Ned3+ Your analysis is probably right. But 29... Ned3+ instead of c5+ makes e5 impossible and wins the game for black, as in the analysis I posted before. Enrique >[D]r5k1/pp4bp/2Pp4/8/1n1KP1p1/1P1n1r2/PBB4R/R2Q2N1 w - - 0 1 > >Where White should definitely play 31. e5! >After 31. ... Bxe5+ 32. Kc4 b5+ 33. Kxb5 Rb8+ 34. Ka4 Nxb2+ 35. Ka3 Nxd1 we >arrive at this position > >[D]1r4k1/p6p/2Pp4/4b3/1n4p1/KP3r2/P1B4R/R2n2N1 w - - 0 1 > >And now White has 36. Bxg7+! a move that would not be possible had White not >jettisoned the e-pawn at move 31. > >After 36. ... Kg7 37. c7 Rc8 38. Rxd1 Bxh2 39. Nxf3 gxf3 40. Bf5 Rxc7 41. Kxb4 >or similar, I think White should be able to hold if the bishops are kept on. I >welcome further analysis. > >Hopefully, the diagrams are correct this time. I'm not sure what the problem >was in the previous post.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.