Author: James T. Walker
Date: 07:47:48 12/19/00
Go up one level in this thread
On December 19, 2000 at 07:55:02, Marcus Kaestner wrote: > >> >>Gambittiger is leading the list but it is not clearly number 1. > >40 points after about 400 games is clear in my opinion. > >> >>Based on the list it is possible that Tiger13,chessmaster8000 or Shredder5 are >>better. > >based on ANY list, anything is possible. > >> >>Deep Fritz was not tested and it has chances to be number 1(even with one >>processor) > >in the german comment stands that deep fritz is going to fight for place one. it >seems that deep fritz will come above 2700 and is close to gambit. > >> >>I am also interested to know the time control of the games. > >they are mixed. about 40% 5m, 50% 30m and 20% 3h. > >> >>I think that it is better to have seperate list for different time control >>games. > >we have seperated lists in the magazine. > >marcus With only 20% of the games played at the longer time control this clearly puts Shredder at a disadvantage. I believe things will be different on the SSDF list because of this. I also believe it's time for the SSDF to consider lowering their time form 40/2 to something less(not sure what). Jim
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.