Author: Wayne Lowrance
Date: 08:26:06 12/19/00
Go up one level in this thread
On December 19, 2000 at 07:55:02, Marcus Kaestner wrote: > >> >>Gambittiger is leading the list but it is not clearly number 1. > >40 points after about 400 games is clear in my opinion. > >> >>Based on the list it is possible that Tiger13,chessmaster8000 or Shredder5 are >>better. > >based on ANY list, anything is possible. > >> >>Deep Fritz was not tested and it has chances to be number 1(even with one >>processor) > >in the german comment stands that deep fritz is going to fight for place one. it >seems that deep fritz will come above 2700 and is close to gambit. > >> >>I am also interested to know the time control of the games. > >they are mixed. about 40% 5m, 50% 30m and 20% 3h. > Humm. That seems strange. I have played game after game with a Aussie Friend of mine at time controls up to 30 min. Fritz6a is King against my Tigers. I still believe that Fritz6a is still the very best at Blitz. I wonder if you have set Fritz to Rated ? It seems to be stronger with that set. Also I wonder what hash size you have set up. More is not better With Fritz in Blitz (it rhym's). But longer time control I have not enough games under my belt but my impression is the Normal Tiger is stronger (slightly) than Gambit and Fritz6a (but not nearly as much fun to watch as that crazy Gambit Cat (my favourite program) Wayne >> >>I think that it is better to have seperate list for different time control >>games. > >we have seperated lists in the magazine. > >marcus
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.