Author: Wayne Lowrance
Date: 08:37:42 12/19/00
Go up one level in this thread
On December 19, 2000 at 09:59:18, Uri Blass wrote: >On December 19, 2000 at 07:55:02, Marcus Kaestner wrote: > >> >>> >>>Gambittiger is leading the list but it is not clearly number 1. >> >>40 points after about 400 games is clear in my opinion. >> >>> >>>Based on the list it is possible that Tiger13,chessmaster8000 or Shredder5 are >>>better. >> >>based on ANY list, anything is possible. > >Gambittiger's rating is between 2739-29 and 2739+29 based on the list and it >means that the lower bound is 2710. > >Not all the programs have an upper bound of less than 2710 but a lot of programs >have upper bound of more than 2710. > >Here is the list of programs that may be better than the lower bound of >gambittiger based on the list. > >1)Tiger13 2686-2745 >2)Shredder5 2674-2734 >3)Chessmaster8000 2571-2831 >4)Rebel tigers 2588-2797(I do not know what is this program) >5)Chessmaster600 2522-2803 >6)Century1.2 2503-2714 >7)Kallisto2 2474-2721 >8)Mchess8 2468-2712 >9)Nimzo99 2363-2770 > I thought they were one and the same, Are they saying they are not and one is better that the other. ? Christophe Please clarify ! The listing implies that Rebel Tiger is weaker ??? Thanks WAyne >Fritz6(6a) has only 2672-2707 so the upper bound fails to be more than 2710. > >Other program also get almost an upper bound of 2710(Tiger11.9 2708,Gandalf4.32g >2705,Littlegoliath 2709). > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.