Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Test position === A move to avoid

Author: Laurence Chen

Date: 19:08:02 12/19/00

Go up one level in this thread

On December 19, 2000 at 18:49:31, Jeroen van Dorp wrote:

>Isn't the real mistake in 31...Kh8? Wouldn't Bf7 have been better?
>White can take the pawn on h7 and the black king must go to e2 or a5.
>But then black can run to safety somewhat cramped, but with some three pawn
>equeivalents up.
>Now what after
>
>28.Nxf8 Be8 29.Rf1 Qh4 30.Bd6 Qh5 31.Be4 Bf7 32.Nxh7 Qe2 (Qa5) 33.Nf6+ Kh8
>
>[D]r6k/1p3b2/p2B1Nnp/8/2PpB3/6R1/4q1PP/5RK1 w - - 0 34
>
>?
>
>Jeroen ;-}
Also after 28. Nxf8 Be8 29. Rf1 Qb6, how can White win?
[D]r3bNk1/1p5p/pq4np/8/2Pp4/B2B2R1/6PP/5RK1 w - - 0 30

• Re: Test position === A move to avoid José Antônio Fabiano Mendes 04:32:27 12/20/00
  • Re: Test position === A move to avoid Pete Galati 16:53:33 12/20/00
    • Re: Test position === A move to avoid Pete Galati 17:38:44 12/20/00
      • Re: Test position === A move to avoid Laurence Chen 18:50:52 12/20/00
        • Re: Test position === A move to avoid Pete Galati 19:40:47 12/20/00

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.