Author: Enrique Irazoqui
Date: 05:40:39 01/23/98
Go up one level in this thread
On January 23, 1998 at 08:07:14, Andreas Mader wrote: >On January 22, 1998 at 11:35:28, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: > >>On January 22, 1998 at 10:09:30, Eric Gallula wrote: >> >>>Hi Friends, >>> >>> >>>Results of Nimzo98 LCTII tests on PC 166 MMX 512K cache 32 MB RAM >>> >>>Positionnal: 225 pts 54% (second behind Hiarcs6) >>> >>>combination: 275 pts! 76% (Best result of all) >>> >>>ending: 170 pts ! (second behind Genius,I think) 63% >>> >>>PERF: 2570 ELO ,may be the number one in the SSDF ranking >>> >>>Best Regards, >>>ERIC >> >>I don't think you should trust this test so much. While Nimzo98 is >>exceptionally quick at tactics, its endings are weak. It belongs in the >>top group of programs. But number one, I doubt it. Still Hiarcs 6... >> >>Enrique > >Enrique, > >you are always picking on Nimzo, although it is a great and wonderful >program. Rubbish! I am not picking on Nimzo at all. You know I like it a lot. Is this what you wanted me to say? OK, lets put it in a way you may like: Nimzo98 is a GREAT program and speed wonder. It also knows quite a bit. Only that its endgame is not up to the rest. Better? :) > You'll have to face it: After 17 years of computer chess, you >are wrong for the first time! Watch out for the next Swedish rating list >and then apologize! ROFL Trying to talk like someone else once again... >Andreas > >P.S.: Enrique blamed me for being too soft and gentle when it comes to >discussions about computer chess. I hope he now changes his mind! :-) You'll have to try harder. :) Enrique
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.