Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: I will continue the match until there is a diffence of 7 games

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 17:23:25 12/20/00

Go up one level in this thread


On December 20, 2000 at 20:05:39, Uri Blass wrote:

>On December 20, 2000 at 19:06:18, Bruce Moreland wrote:
>
>>On December 20, 2000 at 12:17:19, Uri Blass wrote:
>>
>>>I think that 25 out of 32 is more significant than 107 out of 200.
>>
>>I don't think it is a matter of opinion.
>>
>>You have two programs, A and B.  They play 32 games.  Each game is either won or
>>lost.  If one side doesn't score 25 or more, you repeat.  If one side scores 25
>>or more, you stop and call that program stronger.
>>
>>You do the same thing with 200 games and use 107 as your stop score.
>>
>>My experiments showed that for many different rating differences, the odds of
>>making a mistake was about the same.  For instance, if there is a rating point
>>difference of 25 Elo points, in the 200 case the weaker side will score at least
>>107 out of 200 about 7% of the time that someone does it, which will lead you to
>>a wrong conclusion.  In the 32 case, the weaker side will score 25 about 8% of
>>the time that someone does it, likewise leading you to a wrong conclusion.
>
>You are right that if you know before testing that the difference is small then
>25-7 is not so convincing about the question which program is better and it
>seems to be the case when programmers make an upgrade.
>
>In this case 25-7 for the new version is not convincing but 25-7 for the old
>version seems to be more convincing because if you see this kind of result you
>can suspect that the new version has a bug.
>
>Practically if I see 25-7 results between different programs I suspect that the
>difference is clearly bigger than 200 elo so the results seem very convincing to
>me because I do not have an opinion that the difference is small before testing.
>
>Uri

I can add that the 95% confidence is misleading.
It means that you will be wrong in only 5% of the cases by declaring that the
weaker program is the stronger program  but it does not mean that in 95% of the
case when you have a decision you will get the right decision.

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.