Author: Laurence Chen
Date: 18:50:52 12/20/00
Go up one level in this thread
On December 20, 2000 at 20:38:44, Pete Galati wrote: >On December 20, 2000 at 19:53:33, Pete Galati wrote: > >>On December 20, 2000 at 07:32:27, José Antônio Fabiano Mendes wrote: >> >>> Most likely you are both right,I respect your analytical powers, >>> but my question is:"In the position shown,what is the best move?" >>> 28.Nxf8!! seems to me a real find,but is it so? [maybe 28.Nxd8 is stronger >>> after all,who knows?]It is up to you guys to decide...Thank you. JAFM >> >>When I looked at the position, my personal opinion was Bxf8, not Nxf8, but I >>wasn't looking too far ahead. Dos Comet said Nxd8, I didn't run it by anything >>else yet though, got interupted. >> >>Pete > >Ok, Junior just wasn't going to finish search depth of 21 any time soon >probably. KtxQ might just be too much to pass up. > >New position >[D]r2q1rk1/1p1b3p/p3N1np/8/2Pp4/B2B2R1/6PP/2R3K1 w - - 0 1 > >Analysis by Junior 6.0: > >1.Nf4 Rxf4 2.Bxg6 hxg6 > -+ (-10.02) depth: 3 00:00:00 >1.Nxd8 Rfxd8 2.Rf1 Re8 3.Bxg6 > µ (-0.84) depth: 6 00:00:00 3kN >1.Nxd8 Rfxd8 2.Rf1 Re8 3.Bxg6 > µ (-0.84) depth: 6 00:00:00 3kN >1.Nxd8 Rfxd8 2.Be7 Rdc8 3.Bf6 a5 4.Bxd4 b5 5.Rf3 > ³ (-0.66) depth: 9 00:00:00 44kN >1.Nxd8 Rfxd8 2.Be7 Rdc8 3.Bf6 h5 4.Bxd4 h4 5.Rf3 b5 6.c5 > ³ (-0.52) depth: 12 00:00:01 630kN >1.Nxd8 Rfxd8 2.Bc5 Be8 3.Rb1 b5 4.Bb6 Rdc8 5.cxb5 Bxb5 6.Bxd4 Bxd3 7.Rxd3 Nf4 >8.Rf3 > ³ (-0.39) depth: 15 00:00:20 11917kN >1.Nxd8 Rfxd8 2.Bc5 Bc6 3.Rf1 h5 4.Bf5 a5 5.Rd3 Re8 6.Bxd4 Re2 7.Rf2 Rae8 > ³ (-0.44) depth: 17 00:01:17 45072kN >1.Nxd8 Rfxd8 2.Bc5 Bc6 3.Rf1 h5 4.Bb6 Rd7 5.Bf5 Re7 6.Bxd4 h4 7.Rg5 Be4 8.Bg4 > ³ (-0.32) depth: 18 00:02:56 97350kN >1.Nxd8 Rfxd8 2.Bc5 a5 3.Bb6 Rf8 4.Bxg6 hxg6 5.Rxg6+ Kh7 6.Rd6 Bc6 7.Re1 Rfe8 >8.Rxe8 Rxe8 9.Bxd4 Re2 10.g3 > ³ (-0.31) depth: 19 00:06:45 220387kN >1.Nxd8 Rfxd8 2.Bc5 a5 3.Bb6 Rf8 4.Bxg6 hxg6 5.Rxg6+ Kh7 6.Rd6 Bc6 7.Re1 Rfe8 >8.Rf1 Re2 9.Rf2 Rxf2 10.Kxf2 > ³ (-0.35) depth: 20 00:14:51 483133kN >1.Nxd8 Rfxd8 2.Bc5 Bc6 3.Rf1 h5 4.Rf4 Be8 5.Kf2 Bf7 6.Bb6 Rdc8 7.Rxd4 Rf8 > ³ (-0.30) depth: 21 00:32:27 1044000kN > >(Galati, ` 20.12.2000) 1. Nxf8 is a mistake. It may have worked in this game because it was played by humans. Remember Tal's sacrifices, they were not all sound, it was more of a psychological weapon because it is very difficult to work all the possibilities in OTB. If this was a correspondence game I doubt that White would have won this game. Regards, Laurence
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.