Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: No--It is Al Bundy.

Author: Michel Chassey

Date: 12:56:52 12/21/00

Go up one level in this thread


On December 21, 2000 at 00:13:54, Timothy J. Frohlick wrote:

>No Michel, it is Al Bundy. I think that quite a few pretty wealthy guys would
>fill the bill.  Smart in life--dumb in chess.

I may be mistaken but then Bonaparte could be a good example. In life you
get to bend the rules a little ( my lawyers are better than yours ).
Speaking of bending the rules : give that Knight a sword. Then call him
Sir Knight. Now I am dreaming again, my Rook is hanging.

Michel Chassey
ICQ # 34801616
>
>
>Tim Frohlick
>
>
>On December 20, 2000 at 17:12:02, Michel Chassey wrote:
>
>>On December 20, 2000 at 08:14:28, Jouni Uski wrote:
>>
>>>From anonymous:
>>>
>>>"I can't seem to beat any machines at all, not even my little Mattel
>>>Chess Computer, which is twenty years old and fits in the hand.
>>>(Actually, I've beaten the Mattel box a few times at the first
>>>level--but it has four levels!)  My impression is that everything
>>>available these days is way up in the stratosphere."
>>>
>>>Jouni



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.